Re: [PATCH 1116/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

2016-08-02 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 08:07:11PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Tuesday 2016-08-02 14:17, Baole Ni wrote: > > >I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value > >when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. > >As we know, these numeric

Re: [PATCH 1116/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

2016-08-02 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 08:07:11PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Tuesday 2016-08-02 14:17, Baole Ni wrote: > > >I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value > >when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. > >As we know, these numeric

Re: [PATCH 1116/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

2016-08-02 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Tuesday 2016-08-02 14:17, Baole Ni wrote: >I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value >when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. >As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the >corresponding macro, >and that

Re: [PATCH 1116/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

2016-08-02 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Tuesday 2016-08-02 14:17, Baole Ni wrote: >I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value >when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. >As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the >corresponding macro, >and that