Re: [PATCH 15/21] regulator: tps65090: Pass descriptor instead of GPIO number
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018, Linus Walleij wrote: > Instead of passing a global GPIO number for the enable GPIO, pass > a descriptor looked up from the device tree node for the > regulator. > > This regulator supports passing platform data, but enable/sleep > regulators are looked up from the device tree exclusively, so > we can need not touch other files. > > Cc: Lee Jones> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij > --- > Lee: it would be nice if you could ACK this smallish patch to > the MFD header. Fine, but any sign of a conflict and I'll need a PR. Acked-by: Lee Jones > --- > drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c | 50 > -- > include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h | 8 -- > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c > b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c > index 395f35dc8cdb..2d398fa3b720 100644 > --- a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c > +++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c > @@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ > #include > #include > #include > -#include > -#include > +#include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -300,26 +300,6 @@ static int tps65090_regulator_disable_ext_control( > return tps65090_config_ext_control(ri, false); > } > > -static void tps65090_configure_regulator_config( > - struct tps65090_regulator_plat_data *tps_pdata, > - struct regulator_config *config) > -{ > - if (gpio_is_valid(tps_pdata->gpio)) { > - int gpio_flag = GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW; > - > - if (tps_pdata->reg_init_data->constraints.always_on || > - tps_pdata->reg_init_data->constraints.boot_on) > - gpio_flag = GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH; > - > - config->ena_gpio = tps_pdata->gpio; > - config->ena_gpio_initialized = true; > - config->ena_gpio_flags = gpio_flag; > - } else { > - config->ena_gpio = -EINVAL; > - config->ena_gpio_initialized = false; > - } > -} > - > #ifdef CONFIG_OF > static struct of_regulator_match tps65090_matches[] = { > { .name = "dcdc1", }, > @@ -385,9 +365,26 @@ static struct tps65090_platform_data > *tps65090_parse_dt_reg_data( > rpdata->enable_ext_control = of_property_read_bool( > tps65090_matches[idx].of_node, > "ti,enable-ext-control"); > - if (rpdata->enable_ext_control) > - rpdata->gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, > - "dcdc-ext-control-gpios", 0); > + if (rpdata->enable_ext_control) { > + enum gpiod_flags gflags; > + > + if (ri_data->constraints.always_on || > + ri_data->constraints.boot_on) > + gflags = GPIOD_OUT_HIGH; > + else > + gflags = GPIOD_OUT_LOW; > + > + rpdata->gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node(>dev, > + > tps65090_matches[idx].of_node, > + > "dcdc-ext-control-gpios", 0, > + gflags, > + "tps65090"); > + if (IS_ERR(rpdata->gpiod)) > + return ERR_CAST(rpdata->gpiod); > + if (!rpdata->gpiod) > + dev_err(>dev, > + "could not find DCDC external control > GPIO\n"); > + } > > if (of_property_read_u32(tps65090_matches[idx].of_node, >"ti,overcurrent-wait", > @@ -455,8 +452,7 @@ static int tps65090_regulator_probe(struct > platform_device *pdev) >*/ > if (tps_pdata && is_dcdc(num) && tps_pdata->reg_init_data) { > if (tps_pdata->enable_ext_control) { > - tps65090_configure_regulator_config( > - tps_pdata, ); > + config.ena_gpiod = tps_pdata->gpiod; > ri->desc->ops = _ext_control_ops; > } else { > ret = tps65090_regulator_disable_ext_control( > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h b/include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h > index 67d144b3b8f9..f05bf4a146e2 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h > @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ enum { > #define TPS65090_MAX_REG TPS65090_REG_AD_OUT2 > #define TPS65090_NUM_REGS(TPS65090_MAX_REG + 1) > > +struct gpio_desc; > + > struct tps65090 { > struct
Re: [PATCH 15/21] regulator: tps65090: Pass descriptor instead of GPIO number
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018, Linus Walleij wrote: > Instead of passing a global GPIO number for the enable GPIO, pass > a descriptor looked up from the device tree node for the > regulator. > > This regulator supports passing platform data, but enable/sleep > regulators are looked up from the device tree exclusively, so > we can need not touch other files. > > Cc: Lee Jones > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij > --- > Lee: it would be nice if you could ACK this smallish patch to > the MFD header. Fine, but any sign of a conflict and I'll need a PR. Acked-by: Lee Jones > --- > drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c | 50 > -- > include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h | 8 -- > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c > b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c > index 395f35dc8cdb..2d398fa3b720 100644 > --- a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c > +++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c > @@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ > #include > #include > #include > -#include > -#include > +#include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -300,26 +300,6 @@ static int tps65090_regulator_disable_ext_control( > return tps65090_config_ext_control(ri, false); > } > > -static void tps65090_configure_regulator_config( > - struct tps65090_regulator_plat_data *tps_pdata, > - struct regulator_config *config) > -{ > - if (gpio_is_valid(tps_pdata->gpio)) { > - int gpio_flag = GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW; > - > - if (tps_pdata->reg_init_data->constraints.always_on || > - tps_pdata->reg_init_data->constraints.boot_on) > - gpio_flag = GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH; > - > - config->ena_gpio = tps_pdata->gpio; > - config->ena_gpio_initialized = true; > - config->ena_gpio_flags = gpio_flag; > - } else { > - config->ena_gpio = -EINVAL; > - config->ena_gpio_initialized = false; > - } > -} > - > #ifdef CONFIG_OF > static struct of_regulator_match tps65090_matches[] = { > { .name = "dcdc1", }, > @@ -385,9 +365,26 @@ static struct tps65090_platform_data > *tps65090_parse_dt_reg_data( > rpdata->enable_ext_control = of_property_read_bool( > tps65090_matches[idx].of_node, > "ti,enable-ext-control"); > - if (rpdata->enable_ext_control) > - rpdata->gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, > - "dcdc-ext-control-gpios", 0); > + if (rpdata->enable_ext_control) { > + enum gpiod_flags gflags; > + > + if (ri_data->constraints.always_on || > + ri_data->constraints.boot_on) > + gflags = GPIOD_OUT_HIGH; > + else > + gflags = GPIOD_OUT_LOW; > + > + rpdata->gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node(>dev, > + > tps65090_matches[idx].of_node, > + > "dcdc-ext-control-gpios", 0, > + gflags, > + "tps65090"); > + if (IS_ERR(rpdata->gpiod)) > + return ERR_CAST(rpdata->gpiod); > + if (!rpdata->gpiod) > + dev_err(>dev, > + "could not find DCDC external control > GPIO\n"); > + } > > if (of_property_read_u32(tps65090_matches[idx].of_node, >"ti,overcurrent-wait", > @@ -455,8 +452,7 @@ static int tps65090_regulator_probe(struct > platform_device *pdev) >*/ > if (tps_pdata && is_dcdc(num) && tps_pdata->reg_init_data) { > if (tps_pdata->enable_ext_control) { > - tps65090_configure_regulator_config( > - tps_pdata, ); > + config.ena_gpiod = tps_pdata->gpiod; > ri->desc->ops = _ext_control_ops; > } else { > ret = tps65090_regulator_disable_ext_control( > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h b/include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h > index 67d144b3b8f9..f05bf4a146e2 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h > @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ enum { > #define TPS65090_MAX_REG TPS65090_REG_AD_OUT2 > #define TPS65090_NUM_REGS(TPS65090_MAX_REG + 1) > > +struct gpio_desc; > + > struct tps65090 { > struct device *dev; > struct regmap *rmap; > @@ -95,8