On Thursday 04 April 2013, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 4 April 2013 18:32, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Moving the files is good, but I don't see a reason to make the cbe_cpufreq.h
> > header globally visible in include/linux/. Isn't it just used by as the
> > interface between ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c
On 4 April 2013 18:32, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Moving the files is good, but I don't see a reason to make the cbe_cpufreq.h
> header globally visible in include/linux/. Isn't it just used by as the
> interface between ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c and ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c?
When i moved it initially i
On Thursday 04 April 2013, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> This patch moves cpufreq driver of powerpc platforms/cell to drivers/cpufreq.
>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> Cc: linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
> ---
> Compile Tested only.
>
>
On Thursday 04 April 2013, Viresh Kumar wrote:
This patch moves cpufreq driver of powerpc platforms/cell to drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
On 4 April 2013 18:32, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
Moving the files is good, but I don't see a reason to make the cbe_cpufreq.h
header globally visible in include/linux/. Isn't it just used by as the
interface between ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c and ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c?
When i moved it
On Thursday 04 April 2013, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 4 April 2013 18:32, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
Moving the files is good, but I don't see a reason to make the cbe_cpufreq.h
header globally visible in include/linux/. Isn't it just used by as the
interface between
6 matches
Mail list logo
