On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 05:21:15PM -0800, Sonny Rao wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Andrew Morton
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:32:38 -0800
>> > Sonny Rao wrote:
>> >
>> >> >> It's for saving the power to increase batter
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 05:21:15PM -0800, Sonny Rao wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Andrew Morton
a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:32:38 -0800
Sonny Rao sonny...@google.com wrote:
It's
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 05:21:15PM -0800, Sonny Rao wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Andrew Morton
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:32:38 -0800
> > Sonny Rao wrote:
> >
> >> >> It's for saving the power to increase batter life.
> >> >
> >> > It might well have that effect, dunno.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 04:09:57PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:43:27 +0900
> Minchan Kim wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:58:28PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:23:06 +0900
> > > Minchan Kim wrote:
> > >
> > > > > I
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:32:38 -0800
> Sonny Rao wrote:
>
>> >> It's for saving the power to increase batter life.
>> >
>> > It might well have that effect, dunno. That wasn't my intent. Testing
>> > needed!
>> >
>>
>> Power saving is
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:32:38 -0800
Sonny Rao wrote:
> >> It's for saving the power to increase batter life.
> >
> > It might well have that effect, dunno. That wasn't my intent. Testing
> > needed!
> >
>
> Power saving is certainly why we had it on originally for ChromeOS,
> but we turned it
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:43:27 +0900
> Minchan Kim wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:58:28PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> > On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:23:06 +0900
>> > Minchan Kim wrote:
>> >
>> > > > I have a feeling
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:43:27 +0900
Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:58:28PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:23:06 +0900
> > Minchan Kim wrote:
> >
> > > > I have a feeling that laptop mode has bitrotted and these patches are
> > > > kinda
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:43:27 +0900
Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:58:28PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:23:06 +0900
Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote:
I have a feeling that laptop mode has bitrotted and these
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Andrew Morton
a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:43:27 +0900
Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:58:28PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:23:06 +0900
Minchan Kim
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:32:38 -0800
Sonny Rao sonny...@google.com wrote:
It's for saving the power to increase batter life.
It might well have that effect, dunno. That wasn't my intent. Testing
needed!
Power saving is certainly why we had it on originally for ChromeOS,
but we
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Andrew Morton
a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:32:38 -0800
Sonny Rao sonny...@google.com wrote:
It's for saving the power to increase batter life.
It might well have that effect, dunno. That wasn't my intent. Testing
needed!
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 04:09:57PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:43:27 +0900
Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:58:28PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:23:06 +0900
Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 05:21:15PM -0800, Sonny Rao wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Andrew Morton
a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:32:38 -0800
Sonny Rao sonny...@google.com wrote:
It's for saving the power to increase batter life.
It might well have
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:58:28PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:23:06 +0900
> Minchan Kim wrote:
>
> > > I have a feeling that laptop mode has bitrotted and these patches are
> > > kinda hacking around as-yet-not-understood failures...
> >
> > Absolutely,
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:23:06 +0900
Minchan Kim wrote:
> > I have a feeling that laptop mode has bitrotted and these patches are
> > kinda hacking around as-yet-not-understood failures...
>
> Absolutely, this patch is last guard for unexpectable behavior.
> As I mentioned in cover-letter,
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:23:06 +0900
Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote:
I have a feeling that laptop mode has bitrotted and these patches are
kinda hacking around as-yet-not-understood failures...
Absolutely, this patch is last guard for unexpectable behavior.
As I mentioned in
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:58:28PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:23:06 +0900
Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote:
I have a feeling that laptop mode has bitrotted and these patches are
kinda hacking around as-yet-not-understood failures...
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:26:02PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:21:14 +0900
> Minchan Kim wrote:
>
> > If laptop_mode is enable, VM try to avoid I/O for saving the power.
> > But if there isn't reclaimable memory without I/O, we should do I/O
> > for preventing
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:21:14 +0900
Minchan Kim wrote:
> If laptop_mode is enable, VM try to avoid I/O for saving the power.
> But if there isn't reclaimable memory without I/O, we should do I/O
> for preventing unnecessary OOM kill although we sacrifices power.
>
> One of example is that we are
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:21:14 +0900
Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote:
If laptop_mode is enable, VM try to avoid I/O for saving the power.
But if there isn't reclaimable memory without I/O, we should do I/O
for preventing unnecessary OOM kill although we sacrifices power.
One of example
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:26:02PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:21:14 +0900
Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote:
If laptop_mode is enable, VM try to avoid I/O for saving the power.
But if there isn't reclaimable memory without I/O, we should do I/O
for preventing
22 matches
Mail list logo
