Re: [PATCH 2/2] page cache: Mask off unwanted GFP flags

On 04/10, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:45:45PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 05:53:51AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > From: Matthew Wilcox > > > > > > The page cache has used the mapping's GFP flags for allocating > > >

Re: [PATCH 2/2] page cache: Mask off unwanted GFP flags

On 04/10, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:45:45PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 05:53:51AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > From: Matthew Wilcox > > > > > > The page cache has used the mapping's GFP flags for allocating > > > radix tree nodes for a

Re: [PATCH 2/2] page cache: Mask off unwanted GFP flags

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:45:45PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 05:53:51AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > From: Matthew Wilcox > > > > The page cache has used the mapping's GFP flags for allocating > > radix tree nodes for a long time. It took

Re: [PATCH 2/2] page cache: Mask off unwanted GFP flags

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:45:45PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 05:53:51AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > From: Matthew Wilcox > > > > The page cache has used the mapping's GFP flags for allocating > > radix tree nodes for a long time. It took care to always mask off

Re: [PATCH 2/2] page cache: Mask off unwanted GFP flags

On Tue 10-04-18 05:53:51, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > From: Matthew Wilcox > > The page cache has used the mapping's GFP flags for allocating > radix tree nodes for a long time. It took care to always mask off the > __GFP_HIGHMEM flag, and masked off other flags in other

Re: [PATCH 2/2] page cache: Mask off unwanted GFP flags

On Tue 10-04-18 05:53:51, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > From: Matthew Wilcox > > The page cache has used the mapping's GFP flags for allocating > radix tree nodes for a long time. It took care to always mask off the > __GFP_HIGHMEM flag, and masked off other flags in other paths, but the > __GFP_ZERO

Re: [PATCH 2/2] page cache: Mask off unwanted GFP flags

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 05:53:51AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > From: Matthew Wilcox > > The page cache has used the mapping's GFP flags for allocating > radix tree nodes for a long time. It took care to always mask off the > __GFP_HIGHMEM flag, and masked off other

Re: [PATCH 2/2] page cache: Mask off unwanted GFP flags

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 05:53:51AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > From: Matthew Wilcox > > The page cache has used the mapping's GFP flags for allocating > radix tree nodes for a long time. It took care to always mask off the > __GFP_HIGHMEM flag, and masked off other flags in other paths, but

Re: [PATCH 2/2] page cache: Mask off unwanted GFP flags

On Tue 10-04-18 05:53:51, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > From: Matthew Wilcox > > The page cache has used the mapping's GFP flags for allocating > radix tree nodes for a long time. It took care to always mask off the > __GFP_HIGHMEM flag, and masked off other flags in other

Re: [PATCH 2/2] page cache: Mask off unwanted GFP flags

On Tue 10-04-18 05:53:51, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > From: Matthew Wilcox > > The page cache has used the mapping's GFP flags for allocating > radix tree nodes for a long time. It took care to always mask off the > __GFP_HIGHMEM flag, and masked off other flags in other paths, but the > __GFP_ZERO

Re: [PATCH 2/2] page cache: Mask off unwanted GFP flags

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 05:53:51AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > From: Matthew Wilcox > > The page cache has used the mapping's GFP flags for allocating > radix tree nodes for a long time. It took care to always mask off the > __GFP_HIGHMEM flag, and masked off other

Re: [PATCH 2/2] page cache: Mask off unwanted GFP flags

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 05:53:51AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > From: Matthew Wilcox > > The page cache has used the mapping's GFP flags for allocating > radix tree nodes for a long time. It took care to always mask off the > __GFP_HIGHMEM flag, and masked off other flags in other paths, but