On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Kim, Milo wrote:
>> Hmmm, I think we still should use cancel_work() here based on your
>> idea. Please find the patch from Tejun and add him to this loop
>> [PATCH 4/6] workqueue: deprecate flush[_delayed]_work_sync()
>> ---
>> Before this patchset,
>>
>>
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Kim, Milo milo@ti.com wrote:
Hmmm, I think we still should use cancel_work() here based on your
idea. Please find the patch from Tejun and add him to this loop
[PATCH 4/6] workqueue: deprecate flush[_delayed]_work_sync()
---
Before this patchset,
> Hmmm, I think we still should use cancel_work() here based on your
> idea. Please find the patch from Tejun and add him to this loop
> [PATCH 4/6] workqueue: deprecate flush[_delayed]_work_sync()
> ---
> Before this patchset,
>
> flush_work()
>
> flush the last queued instance of the
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Kim, Milo wrote:
> Turning off the brightness of each channel is required
> when removing the driver.
>
> So use flush_work_sync() rather than cancel_work_sync() to wait for
> unhandled brightness works.
Hmmm, I think we still should use cancel_work() here based
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Kim, Milo milo@ti.com wrote:
Turning off the brightness of each channel is required
when removing the driver.
So use flush_work_sync() rather than cancel_work_sync() to wait for
unhandled brightness works.
Hmmm, I think we still should use cancel_work()
Hmmm, I think we still should use cancel_work() here based on your
idea. Please find the patch from Tejun and add him to this loop
[PATCH 4/6] workqueue: deprecate flush[_delayed]_work_sync()
---
Before this patchset,
flush_work()
flush the last queued instance of the work
6 matches
Mail list logo