On Fri 23-09-16 12:47:23, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 09/23/2016 10:23 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 23-09-16 08:55:33, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > [...]
> >> >From 1623d5bd441160569ffad3808aeeec852048e558 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: Vlastimil Babka
> >> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:02:37
On 09/23/2016 10:23 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 23-09-16 08:55:33, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> [...]
>> >From 1623d5bd441160569ffad3808aeeec852048e558 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Vlastimil Babka
>> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:02:37 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: pull no_progress_l
On Fri 23-09-16 08:55:33, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
[...]
> >From 1623d5bd441160569ffad3808aeeec852048e558 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vlastimil Babka
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:02:37 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: pull no_progress_loops update to
> should_reclaim_retry()
>
> The sh
On 09/23/2016 06:04 AM, Hillf Danton wrote:
>>
>> 8<
>> From a7921e57ba1189b9c08fc4879358a908c390e47c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Vlastimil Babka
>> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:02:37 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: pull no_progress_loops update to
>> should_reclaim_retry()
>
>
> 8<
> From a7921e57ba1189b9c08fc4879358a908c390e47c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vlastimil Babka
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:02:37 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: pull no_progress_loops update to
> should_reclaim_retry()
>
> The should_reclaim_retry() makes decisions bas
On 09/22/2016 04:52 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 22-09-16 16:08:21, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Thu 22-09-16 14:51:48, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> > >From 465e1bd61b7a6d6901a44f09b1a76514dbc220fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > From: Vlastimil Babka
>> > Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:54:32 +0200
>> > Su
On 09/22/2016 04:52 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 22-09-16 16:08:21, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Thu 22-09-16 14:51:48, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> > >From 465e1bd61b7a6d6901a44f09b1a76514dbc220fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > From: Vlastimil Babka
>> > Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:54:32 +0200
>> > Su
On Thu 22-09-16 16:08:21, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 22-09-16 14:51:48, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > >From 465e1bd61b7a6d6901a44f09b1a76514dbc220fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Vlastimil Babka
> > Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:54:32 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] mm, compaction: more reliably increa
On Thu 22-09-16 14:51:48, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >From 465e1bd61b7a6d6901a44f09b1a76514dbc220fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vlastimil Babka
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:54:32 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] mm, compaction: more reliably increase direct compaction
> priority-fix
>
> When increasin
On 09/21/2016 07:13 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 06-09-16 15:52:56, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> [...]
>> @@ -3204,6 +3199,15 @@ should_compact_retry(struct alloc_context *ac, int
>> order, int alloc_flags,
>> if (compaction_retries <= max_retries)
>> return true;
>>
>> +/*
On Tue 06-09-16 15:52:56, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
[...]
> @@ -3204,6 +3199,15 @@ should_compact_retry(struct alloc_context *ac, int
> order, int alloc_flags,
> if (compaction_retries <= max_retries)
> return true;
>
> + /*
> + * Make sure there is at least one attempt
11 matches
Mail list logo