On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 6:28 AM, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
> In my Makefile ...
>
> stackp-flags-$(CONFIG_CC_HAS_STACKPROTECTOR_NONE) := -fno-stack-protector
> stackp-flags-$(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR) := -fstack-protector
> stackp-flags-$(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG) := -fstack-protect
2018-04-14 3:11 GMT+09:00 Linus Torvalds :
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>
>> How about something like this instead:
>
> I'd rather avoid the ifdef's in the Makefile if at all possible.
>
> I'd rather expose this as a Kconfig rule, and in the Kconfig just have
> an entry som
2018-04-14 1:41 GMT+09:00 Kees Cook :
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:06 PM, Masahiro Yamada
> wrote:
>> +stackp-flags-$(CONFIG_CC_HAS_STACKPROTECTOR_NONE) := -fno-stack-protector
>> +stackp-flags-$(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR) := -fstack-protector
>> +stackp-flags-$(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ST
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> config STACKPROTECTOR_FLAGS
> string
> default "-fstack-protector-strong" if CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG
> default "-fstack-protector" if CC_STACKPROTECTOR
> default "-fno-stack-protector" if CC_HAS_STACKPRO
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> How about something like this instead:
I'd rather avoid the ifdef's in the Makefile if at all possible.
I'd rather expose this as a Kconfig rule, and in the Kconfig just have
an entry something like this
config STACKPROTECTOR_FLAGS
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:06 PM, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
> +stackp-flags-$(CONFIG_CC_HAS_STACKPROTECTOR_NONE) := -fno-stack-protector
> +stackp-flags-$(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR) := -fstack-protector
> +stackp-flags-$(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG) := -fstack-protector-strong
> +
> +KB
6 matches
Mail list logo
