Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: exynos: Align DMA controller bus node name with dtschema

2020-07-01 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:34:52AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On 29.06.2020 22:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > AMBA is a bus so name the node with DMA controllers just as "bus" to fix
> > dtschema warnings like:
> >
> >  amba: $nodename:0: 'amba' does not match 
> > '^(bus|soc|axi|ahb|apb)(@[0-9a-f]+)?$'
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 
> 
> Do we really need a separate 'bus' for those DMA controllers?
> 
> IMHO they are not different from the hw perspective from the other 
> devices available on the SoC. A separate bus is a historical thing, they 
> work fine when moved directly under the 'soc' node. The separate bus 
> only mimics the way Linux organizes its drivers. This comment affects 
> both ARM and ARM64.

Good point, other boards keep them under SoC usually. Thanks for
feedback.

Best regards,
Krzysztof



Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: exynos: Align DMA controller bus node name with dtschema

2020-06-30 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hi Krzysztof,

On 29.06.2020 22:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> AMBA is a bus so name the node with DMA controllers just as "bus" to fix
> dtschema warnings like:
>
>  amba: $nodename:0: 'amba' does not match 
> '^(bus|soc|axi|ahb|apb)(@[0-9a-f]+)?$'
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 

Do we really need a separate 'bus' for those DMA controllers?

IMHO they are not different from the hw perspective from the other 
devices available on the SoC. A separate bus is a historical thing, they 
work fine when moved directly under the 'soc' node. The separate bus 
only mimics the way Linux organizes its drivers. This comment affects 
both ARM and ARM64.

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland