Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: exynos: Align DMA controller bus node name with dtschema
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:34:52AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On 29.06.2020 22:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > AMBA is a bus so name the node with DMA controllers just as "bus" to fix > > dtschema warnings like: > > > > amba: $nodename:0: 'amba' does not match > > '^(bus|soc|axi|ahb|apb)(@[0-9a-f]+)?$' > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > Do we really need a separate 'bus' for those DMA controllers? > > IMHO they are not different from the hw perspective from the other > devices available on the SoC. A separate bus is a historical thing, they > work fine when moved directly under the 'soc' node. The separate bus > only mimics the way Linux organizes its drivers. This comment affects > both ARM and ARM64. Good point, other boards keep them under SoC usually. Thanks for feedback. Best regards, Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: exynos: Align DMA controller bus node name with dtschema
Hi Krzysztof, On 29.06.2020 22:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > AMBA is a bus so name the node with DMA controllers just as "bus" to fix > dtschema warnings like: > > amba: $nodename:0: 'amba' does not match > '^(bus|soc|axi|ahb|apb)(@[0-9a-f]+)?$' > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Do we really need a separate 'bus' for those DMA controllers? IMHO they are not different from the hw perspective from the other devices available on the SoC. A separate bus is a historical thing, they work fine when moved directly under the 'soc' node. The separate bus only mimics the way Linux organizes its drivers. This comment affects both ARM and ARM64. Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski, PhD Samsung R&D Institute Poland