On 15/06/18 01:48 PM, Serge Semin wrote:
> Concerning the fix of the discovered issues and fixes introduced by this
> patchset. I'd suggest to add the ports-index callbacks to the Switchtec
> driver, which identify local and peer ports. After this the current version
> of all the test drivers
On 15/06/18 01:48 PM, Serge Semin wrote:
> Concerning the fix of the discovered issues and fixes introduced by this
> patchset. I'd suggest to add the ports-index callbacks to the Switchtec
> driver, which identify local and peer ports. After this the current version
> of all the test drivers
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 06:08:13PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe
wrote:
> When the commit adding ntb_default_port_number() and
> ntb_default_peer_port_number() entered the kernel there was no
> users of it so it was impossible to tell what the API needed.
>
> When a user finally landed a year later
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 06:08:13PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe
wrote:
> When the commit adding ntb_default_port_number() and
> ntb_default_peer_port_number() entered the kernel there was no
> users of it so it was impossible to tell what the API needed.
>
> When a user finally landed a year later
On 12/06/18 09:59 AM, Jon Mason wrote:
>> Patches for ntb_pingpong and ntb_perf follow (which are broken
>> otherwise) to support hardware that doesn't have port numbers. This is
>> important not only to not break support with existing drivers but for
>> the cross link topology which, due to
On 12/06/18 09:59 AM, Jon Mason wrote:
>> Patches for ntb_pingpong and ntb_perf follow (which are broken
>> otherwise) to support hardware that doesn't have port numbers. This is
>> important not only to not break support with existing drivers but for
>> the cross link topology which, due to
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> When the commit adding ntb_default_port_number() and
> ntb_default_peer_port_number() entered the kernel there was no
> users of it so it was impossible to tell what the API needed.
>
> When a user finally landed a year later
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> When the commit adding ntb_default_port_number() and
> ntb_default_peer_port_number() entered the kernel there was no
> users of it so it was impossible to tell what the API needed.
>
> When a user finally landed a year later
8 matches
Mail list logo
