On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 04:17:43PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Arnaldo,
>
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:16:12 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:00:05PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> >> Need machine pointer in thread object, so we could
> >> lookup the process
Hi Arnaldo,
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:16:12 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:00:05PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
>> Need machine pointer in thread object, so we could
>> lookup the process thread in following patch.
>
> Can't we use the already existing
Hi Arnaldo,
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:16:12 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:00:05PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
Need machine pointer in thread object, so we could
lookup the process thread in following patch.
Can't we use the already existing thread-mg.machine
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 04:17:43PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Arnaldo,
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:16:12 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:00:05PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
Need machine pointer in thread object, so we could
lookup the process thread in
Em Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:00:05PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> Need machine pointer in thread object, so we could
> lookup the process thread in following patch.
Can't we use the already existing thread->mg.machine for that?
- Arnaldo
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa
> Cc: Don Zickus
> Cc: Corey
Em Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:00:05PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
Need machine pointer in thread object, so we could
lookup the process thread in following patch.
Can't we use the already existing thread-mg.machine for that?
- Arnaldo
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa jo...@redhat.com
Cc: Don Zickus
6 matches
Mail list logo