Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/190] 4.4.128-stable review

[Guenter Roeck]

On 04/11/2018 11:34 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.128 release.
There are 190 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Fri Apr 13 18:34:54 UTC 2018.
Anything received after that time might be too late.



Build results:
total: 145 pass: 145 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 127 pass: 127 fail: 0

Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.

Guenter

Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/190] 4.4.128-stable review

[Guenter Roeck]

On 04/11/2018 11:34 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.128 release.
There are 190 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Fri Apr 13 18:34:54 UTC 2018.
Anything received after that time might be too late.



Build results:
total: 145 pass: 145 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 127 pass: 127 fail: 0

Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.

Guenter

Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/190] 4.4.128-stable review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On 12 April 2018 at 00:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman
 wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.128 release.
> There are 190 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri Apr 13 18:34:54 UTC 2018.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.128-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
> linux-4.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.

Summary


kernel: 4.4.128-rc1
git repo: 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-4.4.y
git commit: e9832d7653b2d69d156dcad4c78f82330c781aff
git describe: v4.4.127-191-ge9832d7653b2
Test details: 
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.127-191-ge9832d7653b2


No regressions (compared to build v4.4.127-166-ge5eeab3948ec)

Boards, architectures and test suites:
-

juno-r2 - arm64
* boot - pass: 20
* kselftest - skip: 30, pass: 33
* libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 90
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-containers-tests - skip: 53, pass: 28
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs-tests - skip: 2, pass: 61
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-sched-tests - skip: 4, pass: 10
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 152, pass: 998
* ltp-timers-tests - skip: 1, pass: 12

qemu_x86_64
* boot - pass: 22
* kselftest - skip: 33, pass: 47
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native - skip: 33, pass: 47
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none - skip: 33, pass: 47
* libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 90
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-containers-tests - skip: 17, pass: 64
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs-tests - skip: 6, pass: 57
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-sched-tests - skip: 1, pass: 13
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 150, pass: 1000
* ltp-timers-tests - skip: 1, pass: 12

x15 - arm
* boot - pass: 20
* kselftest - skip: 29, pass: 32
* libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 87
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-containers-tests - skip: 17, pass: 64
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs-tests - skip: 2, pass: 61
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - skip: 2, pass: 20
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-sched-tests - skip: 1, pass: 13
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 98, pass: 1052
* ltp-timers-tests - skip: 1, pass: 12

x86_64
* boot - pass: 22
* kselftest - skip: 31, fail: 1, pass: 48
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native - skip: 31, fail: 1, pass: 48
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none - skip: 31, fail: 2, pass: 47
* libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 90
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-containers-tests - skip: 17, pass: 64
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs-tests - skip: 1, pass: 62
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-sched-tests - skip: 5, pass: 9
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 120, pass: 1030
* ltp-timers-tests - skip: 1, pass: 12

Hikey test results,

Summary


kernel: 4.4.128-rc1
git repo: https://git.linaro.org/lkft/arm64-stable-rc.git
git tag: 4.4.128-rc1-hikey-20180411-171
git commit: 692c708326e6648cb5dcbc0b0e88b8036ca2fdbd
git describe: 4.4.128-rc1-hikey-20180411-171
Test details: 
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linaro-hikey-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/4.4.128-rc1-hikey-20180411-171


No regressions (compared to build 4.4.128-rc1-hikey-20180410-170)

Boards, architectures and test suites:

Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/190] 4.4.128-stable review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On 12 April 2018 at 00:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman
 wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.128 release.
> There are 190 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri Apr 13 18:34:54 UTC 2018.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.128-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
> linux-4.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.

Summary


kernel: 4.4.128-rc1
git repo: 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-4.4.y
git commit: e9832d7653b2d69d156dcad4c78f82330c781aff
git describe: v4.4.127-191-ge9832d7653b2
Test details: 
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.127-191-ge9832d7653b2


No regressions (compared to build v4.4.127-166-ge5eeab3948ec)

Boards, architectures and test suites:
-

juno-r2 - arm64
* boot - pass: 20
* kselftest - skip: 30, pass: 33
* libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 90
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-containers-tests - skip: 53, pass: 28
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs-tests - skip: 2, pass: 61
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-sched-tests - skip: 4, pass: 10
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 152, pass: 998
* ltp-timers-tests - skip: 1, pass: 12

qemu_x86_64
* boot - pass: 22
* kselftest - skip: 33, pass: 47
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native - skip: 33, pass: 47
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none - skip: 33, pass: 47
* libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 90
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-containers-tests - skip: 17, pass: 64
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs-tests - skip: 6, pass: 57
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-sched-tests - skip: 1, pass: 13
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 150, pass: 1000
* ltp-timers-tests - skip: 1, pass: 12

x15 - arm
* boot - pass: 20
* kselftest - skip: 29, pass: 32
* libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 87
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-containers-tests - skip: 17, pass: 64
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs-tests - skip: 2, pass: 61
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - skip: 2, pass: 20
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-sched-tests - skip: 1, pass: 13
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 98, pass: 1052
* ltp-timers-tests - skip: 1, pass: 12

x86_64
* boot - pass: 22
* kselftest - skip: 31, fail: 1, pass: 48
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native - skip: 31, fail: 1, pass: 48
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none - skip: 31, fail: 2, pass: 47
* libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 90
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-containers-tests - skip: 17, pass: 64
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs-tests - skip: 1, pass: 62
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-sched-tests - skip: 5, pass: 9
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 120, pass: 1030
* ltp-timers-tests - skip: 1, pass: 12

Hikey test results,

Summary


kernel: 4.4.128-rc1
git repo: https://git.linaro.org/lkft/arm64-stable-rc.git
git tag: 4.4.128-rc1-hikey-20180411-171
git commit: 692c708326e6648cb5dcbc0b0e88b8036ca2fdbd
git describe: 4.4.128-rc1-hikey-20180411-171
Test details: 
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linaro-hikey-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/4.4.128-rc1-hikey-20180411-171


No regressions (compared to build 4.4.128-rc1-hikey-20180410-170)

Boards, architectures and test suites:
-

hi6220-hikey - 

Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/190] 4.4.128-stable review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 01:52:40PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 08:34:06PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.128 release.
> > There are 190 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Fri Apr 13 18:34:54 UTC 2018.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.128-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
> > linux-4.4.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> > 
> 
> Merged, compiled, and flashed onto my Pixel 2 XL and OnePlus 5.
> 
> Ever since switching to Clang on the OP5 back in December, I haven't
> been compiling with GCC at all which was a mistake. So I have started
> compiling with Google's GCC 4.9.4, Bootlin's GCC 7.3.0, Google's Clang
> 5.0, and my own Clang 6.0 and 7.0. All builds completed successfully
> with -Werror.
> 
> No initial issues in dmesg or general usage.

Great! Thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/190] 4.4.128-stable review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 01:52:40PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 08:34:06PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.128 release.
> > There are 190 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Fri Apr 13 18:34:54 UTC 2018.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.128-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
> > linux-4.4.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> > 
> 
> Merged, compiled, and flashed onto my Pixel 2 XL and OnePlus 5.
> 
> Ever since switching to Clang on the OP5 back in December, I haven't
> been compiling with GCC at all which was a mistake. So I have started
> compiling with Google's GCC 4.9.4, Bootlin's GCC 7.3.0, Google's Clang
> 5.0, and my own Clang 6.0 and 7.0. All builds completed successfully
> with -Werror.
> 
> No initial issues in dmesg or general usage.

Great! Thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/190] 4.4.128-stable review

[Shuah Khan]

On 04/11/2018 12:34 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.128 release.
> There are 190 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri Apr 13 18:34:54 UTC 2018.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>   
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.128-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>   
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
> linux-4.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

thanks,
-- Shuah

Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/190] 4.4.128-stable review

[Shuah Khan]

On 04/11/2018 12:34 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.128 release.
> There are 190 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri Apr 13 18:34:54 UTC 2018.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>   
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.128-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>   
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
> linux-4.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

thanks,
-- Shuah

Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/190] 4.4.128-stable review

[Nathan Chancellor]

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 08:34:06PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.128 release.
> There are 190 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri Apr 13 18:34:54 UTC 2018.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>   
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.128-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>   
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
> linux-4.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Merged, compiled, and flashed onto my Pixel 2 XL and OnePlus 5.

Ever since switching to Clang on the OP5 back in December, I haven't
been compiling with GCC at all which was a mistake. So I have started
compiling with Google's GCC 4.9.4, Bootlin's GCC 7.3.0, Google's Clang
5.0, and my own Clang 6.0 and 7.0. All builds completed successfully
with -Werror.

No initial issues in dmesg or general usage.

Thanks!
Nathan

Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/190] 4.4.128-stable review

[Nathan Chancellor]

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 08:34:06PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.128 release.
> There are 190 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri Apr 13 18:34:54 UTC 2018.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>   
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.128-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>   
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
> linux-4.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Merged, compiled, and flashed onto my Pixel 2 XL and OnePlus 5.

Ever since switching to Clang on the OP5 back in December, I haven't
been compiling with GCC at all which was a mistake. So I have started
compiling with Google's GCC 4.9.4, Bootlin's GCC 7.3.0, Google's Clang
5.0, and my own Clang 6.0 and 7.0. All builds completed successfully
with -Werror.

No initial issues in dmesg or general usage.

Thanks!
Nathan