Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-11 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 10/11/2016 03:19 AM, Mark Brown wrote: On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:47:43PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:11:23PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote: My connection doesn't have IPv6 and is a bit spotty right now so it's a bit difficult for me to check by lab but today's -next

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-11 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 10/11/2016 03:19 AM, Mark Brown wrote: On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:47:43PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:11:23PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote: My connection doesn't have IPv6 and is a bit spotty right now so it's a bit difficult for me to check by lab but today's -next

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-11 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:47:43PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:11:23PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote: > > My connection doesn't have IPv6 and is a bit spotty right now so it's a > > bit difficult for me to check by lab but today's -next jobs are working > > for me as

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-11 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:47:43PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:11:23PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote: > > My connection doesn't have IPv6 and is a bit spotty right now so it's a > > bit difficult for me to check by lab but today's -next jobs are working > > for me as

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-11 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:47:43PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:11:23PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote: > > My connection doesn't have IPv6 and is a bit spotty right now so it's a > > bit difficult for me to check by lab but today's -next jobs are working > > for me as

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-11 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:47:43PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:11:23PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote: > > My connection doesn't have IPv6 and is a bit spotty right now so it's a > > bit difficult for me to check by lab but today's -next jobs are working > > for me as

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-10 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:11:23PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 05:54:22AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > Can I find the qemu command line somewhere ? The following work fine > > for me. > > > Building arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9 ... running > >

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-10 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:11:23PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 05:54:22AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > Can I find the qemu command line somewhere ? The following work fine > > for me. > > > Building arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9 ... running > >

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-10 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 05:54:22AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Can I find the qemu command line somewhere ? The following work fine > for me. > Building arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9 ... running > . passed > Building

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-10 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 05:54:22AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Can I find the qemu command line somewhere ? The following work fine > for me. > Building arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9 ... running > . passed > Building

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-10 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 10/10/2016 02:38 AM, Mark Brown wrote: On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 10:22:41AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On 10/08/2016 09:11 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1: 1 failed lab vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7: 1 failed lab These builds are known broken an QEMU need to be

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-10 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 10/10/2016 02:38 AM, Mark Brown wrote: On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 10:22:41AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On 10/08/2016 09:11 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1: 1 failed lab vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7: 1 failed lab These builds are known broken an QEMU need to be

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-10 Thread Mark Brown
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 10:22:41AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/08/2016 09:11 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > > > > vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1: 1 failed lab > > > > vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7: 1 failed lab > > These builds are known broken an QEMU need to be blacklisted until we > > find

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-10 Thread Mark Brown
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 10:22:41AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/08/2016 09:11 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > > > > vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1: 1 failed lab > > > > vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7: 1 failed lab > > These builds are known broken an QEMU need to be blacklisted until we > > find

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-08 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 10/08/2016 09:11 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 03:26:04PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote: stable-rc boot: 479 boots: 4 failed, 183 passed with 292 offline (v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab) Full Boot Summary:

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-08 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 10/08/2016 09:11 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 03:26:04PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote: stable-rc boot: 479 boots: 4 failed, 183 passed with 292 offline (v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab) Full Boot Summary:

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-08 Thread Kevin Hilman
Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 03:26:04PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote: >> stable-rc boot: 479 boots: 4 failed, 183 passed with 292 offline >> (v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab) >> >> Full Boot Summary: >>

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-08 Thread Kevin Hilman
Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 03:26:04PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote: >> stable-rc boot: 479 boots: 4 failed, 183 passed with 292 offline >> (v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab) >> >> Full Boot Summary: >> https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab/

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-08 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 03:26:04PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote: > stable-rc boot: 479 boots: 4 failed, 183 passed with 292 offline > (v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab) > > Full Boot Summary: > https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab/ > Full Build Summary: >

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-08 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 03:26:04PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote: > stable-rc boot: 479 boots: 4 failed, 183 passed with 292 offline > (v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab) > > Full Boot Summary: > https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab/ > Full Build Summary: >

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-06 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 11:51:01AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 10:18:23AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.8.1 release. > > There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one.

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-06 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 11:51:01AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 10:18:23AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.8.1 release. > > There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one.

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-06 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 01:56:28PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 10/06/2016 02:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.8.1 release. > > There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-06 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 01:56:28PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 10/06/2016 02:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.8.1 release. > > There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-06 Thread Shuah Khan
On 10/06/2016 02:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.8.1 release. > There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-06 Thread Shuah Khan
On 10/06/2016 02:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.8.1 release. > There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-06 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 10:18:23AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.8.1 release. > There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know.

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-06 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 10:18:23AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.8.1 release. > There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know.