On Wednesday 15 July 2015 09:54:45 David Daney wrote:
> From: David Daney
>
> Signed-off-by: David Daney
Please describe here in what way is this incompatible with SBSA.
>From earlier discussions I had expected ThunderX to be SBSA compliant,
so I'm a bit surprised to see a PCI hack now.
>
On Wednesday 15 July 2015 09:54:45 David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney david.da...@cavium.com
Signed-off-by: David Daney david.da...@cavium.com
Please describe here in what way is this incompatible with SBSA.
From earlier discussions I had expected ThunderX to be SBSA compliant,
so I'm a bit
On 07/16/2015 01:31 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
On wo, 2015-07-15 at 09:54 -0700, David Daney wrote:
--- a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
+config PCI_THUNDER_PEM
+ bool
Do you expect other symbols to select this symbol in the future?
No, ...
Because
at this
Hi David,
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 05:54:45PM +0100, David Daney wrote:
> From: David Daney
>
-ENOCOMMITLOG
> Signed-off-by: David Daney
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/Kconfig| 12 +
> drivers/pci/host/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-thunder-pem.c | 462
>
On wo, 2015-07-15 at 09:54 -0700, David Daney wrote:
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
> +config PCI_THUNDER_PEM
> + bool
Do you expect other symbols to select this symbol in the future? Because
at this moment PCI_THUNDER_PEM is merely an alias for
On wo, 2015-07-15 at 09:54 -0700, David Daney wrote:
--- a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
+config PCI_THUNDER_PEM
+ bool
Do you expect other symbols to select this symbol in the future? Because
at this moment PCI_THUNDER_PEM is merely an alias for PCI_THUNDER.
Hi David,
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 05:54:45PM +0100, David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney david.da...@cavium.com
-ENOCOMMITLOG
Signed-off-by: David Daney david.da...@cavium.com
---
drivers/pci/host/Kconfig| 12 +
drivers/pci/host/Makefile | 2 +
On 07/16/2015 01:31 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
On wo, 2015-07-15 at 09:54 -0700, David Daney wrote:
--- a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
+config PCI_THUNDER_PEM
+ bool
Do you expect other symbols to select this symbol in the future?
No, ...
Because
at this
On 15/07/15 17:54, David Daney wrote:
> From: David Daney
>
> Signed-off-by: David Daney
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/Kconfig| 12 +
> drivers/pci/host/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-thunder-pem.c | 462
>
>
Hi,
As mentioned in my reply to the cover letter, a DT binding document is
necessary for this.
It looks like many of the properties of your root complex which should
be described (e.g. physical addresses, master IDs as visible to MSI
controllers) are blindly assumed by this driver, and I expect
On 15/07/15 17:54, David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney david.da...@cavium.com
Signed-off-by: David Daney david.da...@cavium.com
---
drivers/pci/host/Kconfig| 12 +
drivers/pci/host/Makefile | 2 +
drivers/pci/host/pcie-thunder-pem.c | 462
Hi,
As mentioned in my reply to the cover letter, a DT binding document is
necessary for this.
It looks like many of the properties of your root complex which should
be described (e.g. physical addresses, master IDs as visible to MSI
controllers) are blindly assumed by this driver, and I expect
12 matches
Mail list logo
