On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Jani Nikula
wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> Don't be a dummy... This is easy to review an it fixes a bug.
In this particular case it might not be clear that an unknown GCT
version
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Jani Nikula
wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> Don't be a dummy... This is easy to review an it fixes a bug.
In this particular case it might not be clear that an unknown GCT
version causes a complete GCT failure so both messages are useful.
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Don't be a dummy... This is easy to review an it fixes a bug.
>
> I'm fine with you NAKing all these patches based on who they are from.
> I mostly just delete these without responding because the guy has
> history of
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Don't be a dummy... This is easy to review an it fixes a bug.
>
> I'm fine with you NAKing all these patches based on who they are from.
> I mostly just delete these without responding because the guy has
> history of introducing bugs and never listens
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 01:07:35PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > From: Markus Elfring
> > Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:36:19 +0200
> >
> > A single error message should be sufficient to
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 01:07:35PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > From: Markus Elfring
> > Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:36:19 +0200
> >
> > A single error message should be sufficient to inform about
> > the detection of an unknown GCT revision at the
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:36:19 +0200
>
> A single error message should be sufficient to inform about
> the detection of an unknown GCT revision at the end.
> Thus
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:36:19 +0200
>
> A single error message should be sufficient to inform about
> the detection of an unknown GCT revision at the end.
> Thus return after the logging call in this case directly.
Did you
8 matches
Mail list logo