On Thu 08-11-12 10:04:17, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 07:02:46PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 08-11-12 09:57:50, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo
> > > Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo
> >
> > You probably meant Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko ;)
>
> Hehehheheh...
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 07:02:46PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 08-11-12 09:57:50, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo
> > Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo
>
> You probably meant Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko ;)
Hehehheheh... man, I'm too self-absolved. Thanks for noticing
that. :)
On Thu 08-11-12 09:57:50, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Up until now, cgroup_freezer didn't implement hierarchy properly.
> cgroups could be arranged in hierarchy but it didn't make any
> difference in how each cgroup_freezer behaved. They all operated
> separately.
>
> This patch implements proper
On Thu 08-11-12 09:57:50, Tejun Heo wrote:
Up until now, cgroup_freezer didn't implement hierarchy properly.
cgroups could be arranged in hierarchy but it didn't make any
difference in how each cgroup_freezer behaved. They all operated
separately.
This patch implements proper hierarchy
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 07:02:46PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Thu 08-11-12 09:57:50, Tejun Heo wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org
You probably meant Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko ;)
Hehehheheh... man, I'm too self-absolved. Thanks
On Thu 08-11-12 10:04:17, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 07:02:46PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Thu 08-11-12 09:57:50, Tejun Heo wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org
You probably meant Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko ;)
6 matches
Mail list logo