> >> > pstore writes could potentially be invoked in interrupt context and
> >> > it uses set_variable<>() and query_variable_info<>() to store logs.
> >> > If we invoke efi_runtime_services() through efi_rts_wq while in
> >> > atomic() kernel issues a warning ("scheduling wile in atomic") and
>
> >> > pstore writes could potentially be invoked in interrupt context and
> >> > it uses set_variable<>() and query_variable_info<>() to store logs.
> >> > If we invoke efi_runtime_services() through efi_rts_wq while in
> >> > atomic() kernel issues a warning ("scheduling wile in atomic") and
>
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:11 PM, Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
wrote:
> 05, 2018 at 03:23:10PM -0800, Sai Praneeth Prakhya wrote:
>> > From: Sai Praneeth
>> >
>> > Presently, efi_runtime_services() are executed by firmware in process
>> >
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:11 PM, Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
wrote:
> 05, 2018 at 03:23:10PM -0800, Sai Praneeth Prakhya wrote:
>> > From: Sai Praneeth
>> >
>> > Presently, efi_runtime_services() are executed by firmware in process
>> > context. To execute efi_runtime_service(), kernel switches the
05, 2018 at 03:23:10PM -0800, Sai Praneeth Prakhya wrote:
> > From: Sai Praneeth
> >
> > Presently, efi_runtime_services() are executed by firmware in process
> > context. To execute efi_runtime_service(), kernel switches the page
> > directory from swapper_pgd to
05, 2018 at 03:23:10PM -0800, Sai Praneeth Prakhya wrote:
> > From: Sai Praneeth
> >
> > Presently, efi_runtime_services() are executed by firmware in process
> > context. To execute efi_runtime_service(), kernel switches the page
> > directory from swapper_pgd to efi_pgd. However, efi_pgd
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 03:23:10PM -0800, Sai Praneeth Prakhya wrote:
> From: Sai Praneeth
>
> Presently, efi_runtime_services() are executed by firmware in process
> context. To execute efi_runtime_service(), kernel switches the page
> directory from swapper_pgd
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 03:23:10PM -0800, Sai Praneeth Prakhya wrote:
> From: Sai Praneeth
>
> Presently, efi_runtime_services() are executed by firmware in process
> context. To execute efi_runtime_service(), kernel switches the page
> directory from swapper_pgd to efi_pgd. However, efi_pgd
> > Presently, efi_runtime_services() are executed by firmware in process
> > context. To execute efi_runtime_service(), kernel switches the page
> > directory from swapper_pgd to efi_pgd. However, efi_pgd doesn't have
> > any user space mappings. A potential issue could be, for instance, an
> >
> > Presently, efi_runtime_services() are executed by firmware in process
> > context. To execute efi_runtime_service(), kernel switches the page
> > directory from swapper_pgd to efi_pgd. However, efi_pgd doesn't have
> > any user space mappings. A potential issue could be, for instance, an
> >
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 3:23 PM, Sai Praneeth Prakhya
wrote:
> From: Sai Praneeth
>
> Presently, efi_runtime_services() are executed by firmware in process
> context. To execute efi_runtime_service(), kernel switches the page
>
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 3:23 PM, Sai Praneeth Prakhya
wrote:
> From: Sai Praneeth
>
> Presently, efi_runtime_services() are executed by firmware in process
> context. To execute efi_runtime_service(), kernel switches the page
> directory from swapper_pgd to efi_pgd. However, efi_pgd doesn't have
12 matches
Mail list logo