On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 02:36:07PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 03/01/2018 05:19 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > This patch set is a different way to address the pressing need to access
> > task_struct pointers in sched tracepoints from bpf programs.
> >
> > The first approach simply
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 02:36:07PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 03/01/2018 05:19 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > This patch set is a different way to address the pressing need to access
> > task_struct pointers in sched tracepoints from bpf programs.
> >
> > The first approach simply
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 14:36:07 +0100
Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Ping, Peter/Steven. If you have a chance, please review the series.
You're not off my radar, but I'm doing a lot of traveling for the next
two weeks (started last week). I'll see if I can find some time to look
at
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 14:36:07 +0100
Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Ping, Peter/Steven. If you have a chance, please review the series.
You're not off my radar, but I'm doing a lot of traveling for the next
two weeks (started last week). I'll see if I can find some time to look
at them. I scanned them
On 03/01/2018 05:19 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> This patch set is a different way to address the pressing need to access
> task_struct pointers in sched tracepoints from bpf programs.
>
> The first approach simply added these pointers to sched tracepoints:
>
On 03/01/2018 05:19 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> This patch set is a different way to address the pressing need to access
> task_struct pointers in sched tracepoints from bpf programs.
>
> The first approach simply added these pointers to sched tracepoints:
>
6 matches
Mail list logo