Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpf: Update LSM selftests for bpf_ima_inode_hash

2020-11-20 Thread KP Singh
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 7:11 PM Yonghong Song  wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/20/20 5:17 AM, KP Singh wrote:
> > From: KP Singh 
> >
> > - Update the IMA policy before executing the test binary (this is not an
> >override of the policy, just an append that ensures that hashes are
> >calculated on executions).
> >
> > - Call the bpf_ima_inode_hash in the bprm_committed_creds hook and check
> >if the call succeeded and a hash was calculated.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KP Singh 
>
> LGTM with a few nits below.
>
> Acked-by: Yonghong Song 
>
> > ---
> >   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config|  3 ++

[...]

> >   }
> >
> [...]
> > +
> >   void test_test_lsm(void)
> >   {
> >   struct lsm *skel = NULL;
> > @@ -66,6 +88,10 @@ void test_test_lsm(void)
> >   if (CHECK(err, "attach", "lsm attach failed: %d\n", err))
> >   goto close_prog;
> >
> > + err = update_ima_policy();
> > + if (CHECK(err != 0, "update_ima_policy", "error = %d\n", err))
> > + goto close_prog;
>
> "err != 0" => err?
> "error = %d" => "err %d" for consistency with other usage in this function.

Done.

>
> > +
> >   err = exec_cmd(>bss->monitored_pid);
> >   if (CHECK(err < 0, "exec_cmd", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno))
> >   goto close_prog;
> > @@ -83,6 +109,12 @@ void test_test_lsm(void)

[...]

> >   int mprotect_count = 0;
> >   int bprm_count = 0;
> > +int ima_hash_ret = -1;
>
> The helper returns type "long", but "int" type here should be fine too.

Changed it to long for correctness.


Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpf: Update LSM selftests for bpf_ima_inode_hash

2020-11-20 Thread Yonghong Song




On 11/20/20 5:17 AM, KP Singh wrote:

From: KP Singh 

- Update the IMA policy before executing the test binary (this is not an
   override of the policy, just an append that ensures that hashes are
   calculated on executions).

- Call the bpf_ima_inode_hash in the bprm_committed_creds hook and check
   if the call succeeded and a hash was calculated.

Signed-off-by: KP Singh 


LGTM with a few nits below.

Acked-by: Yonghong Song 


---
  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config|  3 ++
  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c   | 32 +++
  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm.c   |  7 +++-
  3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
index 2118e23ac07a..4b5764031368 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
@@ -39,3 +39,6 @@ CONFIG_BPF_JIT=y
  CONFIG_BPF_LSM=y
  CONFIG_SECURITY=y
  CONFIG_LIRC=y
+CONFIG_IMA=y
+CONFIG_IMA_WRITE_POLICY=y
+CONFIG_IMA_READ_POLICY=y
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c
index 6ab29226c99b..3f5d64adb233 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c
@@ -52,6 +52,28 @@ int exec_cmd(int *monitored_pid)
return -EINVAL;
  }
  

[...]

+
  void test_test_lsm(void)
  {
struct lsm *skel = NULL;
@@ -66,6 +88,10 @@ void test_test_lsm(void)
if (CHECK(err, "attach", "lsm attach failed: %d\n", err))
goto close_prog;
  
+	err = update_ima_policy();

+   if (CHECK(err != 0, "update_ima_policy", "error = %d\n", err))
+   goto close_prog;


"err != 0" => err?
"error = %d" => "err %d" for consistency with other usage in this function.


+
err = exec_cmd(>bss->monitored_pid);
if (CHECK(err < 0, "exec_cmd", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno))
goto close_prog;
@@ -83,6 +109,12 @@ void test_test_lsm(void)
CHECK(skel->bss->mprotect_count != 1, "mprotect_count",
  "mprotect_count = %d\n", skel->bss->mprotect_count);
  
+	CHECK(skel->data->ima_hash_ret < 0, "ima_hash_ret",

+ "ima_hash_ret = %d\n", skel->data->ima_hash_ret);
+
+   CHECK(skel->bss->ima_hash == 0, "ima_hash",
+ "ima_hash = %lu\n", skel->bss->ima_hash);
+
syscall(__NR_setdomainname, , -2L);
syscall(__NR_setdomainname, 0, -3L);
syscall(__NR_setdomainname, ~0L, -4L);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm.c
index ff4d343b94b5..b0f9639e4b0a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm.c
@@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
  int monitored_pid = 0;
  int mprotect_count = 0;
  int bprm_count = 0;
+int ima_hash_ret = -1;


The helper returns type "long", but "int" type here should be fine too.


+u64 ima_hash = 0;
  
  SEC("lsm/file_mprotect")

  int BPF_PROG(test_int_hook, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
@@ -65,8 +67,11 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_void_hook, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
__u32 key = 0;
__u64 *value;
  
-	if (monitored_pid == pid)

+   if (monitored_pid == pid) {
bprm_count++;
+   ima_hash_ret = bpf_ima_inode_hash(bprm->file->f_inode,
+ _hash, sizeof(ima_hash));
+   }
  
  	bpf_copy_from_user(args, sizeof(args), (void *)bprm->vma->vm_mm->arg_start);

bpf_copy_from_user(args, sizeof(args), (void *)bprm->mm->arg_start);