On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 04:19:55 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 03:15:12 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 22:57 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 09:10:41
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 04:19:55 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 03:15:12 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 22:57 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> i think we should put jiang four patches before Rafael's patches.
>>
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/yinghai/linux-yinghai.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-pci-jiang-hotplug
>
> Actually, I have something more radical
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 03:15:12 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 22:57 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 09:10:41 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
>> > > On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 02:48 +0100, Rafael
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 03:15:12 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 22:57 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 09:10:41 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 02:48 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> :
> > > We need to decide which module is
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 22:57 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 09:10:41 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 02:48 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
:
> > We need to decide which module is responsible for calling .bind(). I
> > think it should be the ACPI
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 10:59:46 AM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 02:48 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > So, I would propose the following changes.
> >
> > - Move the acpi_hot_add_bind() call back to the original
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 09:10:41 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 02:48 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, December 17, 2012 05:08:17 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 23:17 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> > > >
> > >
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 10:59 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 02:48 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >
>> > So, I would propose the following changes.
>> >
>> > - Move
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 10:59 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 02:48 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > So, I would propose the following changes.
> >
> > - Move the acpi_hot_add_bind() call back to the original place
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 02:48 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> So, I would propose the following changes.
>
> - Move the acpi_hot_add_bind() call back to the original place after
> the device_attach() call.
> - Rename the name of
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 02:48 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, December 17, 2012 05:08:17 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 23:17 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> > >
> >
> > (snip)
> >
> > > struct acpi_device_ops {
> > > Index:
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 02:48 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, December 17, 2012 05:08:17 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 23:17 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
(snip)
struct acpi_device_ops {
Index:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Toshi Kani toshi.k...@hp.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 02:48 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
So, I would propose the following changes.
- Move the acpi_hot_add_bind() call back to the original place after
the device_attach() call.
- Rename the name of
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 10:59 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Toshi Kani toshi.k...@hp.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 02:48 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
So, I would propose the following changes.
- Move the acpi_hot_add_bind() call back to the original
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Toshi Kani toshi.k...@hp.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 10:59 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Toshi Kani toshi.k...@hp.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 02:48 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
So, I would propose the following
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 09:10:41 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 02:48 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, December 17, 2012 05:08:17 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 23:17 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 10:59:46 AM Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Toshi Kani toshi.k...@hp.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 02:48 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
So, I would propose the following changes.
- Move the acpi_hot_add_bind() call back to the
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 22:57 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 09:10:41 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 02:48 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
:
We need to decide which module is responsible for calling .bind(). I
think it should be the ACPI scan
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 03:15:12 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 22:57 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 09:10:41 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 02:48 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
:
We need to decide which module is responsible
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 03:15:12 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 22:57 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 09:10:41 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 02:48 +0100,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
i think we should put jiang four patches before Rafael's patches.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/yinghai/linux-yinghai.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-pci-jiang-hotplug
Actually, I have something more radical
On Monday, December 17, 2012 05:08:17 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 23:17 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
>
> (snip)
>
> > struct acpi_device_ops {
> > Index: linux/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> >
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 23:17 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
(snip)
> struct acpi_device_ops {
> Index: linux/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> ===
> --- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 23:17 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
(snip)
struct acpi_device_ops {
Index: linux/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===
--- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++
On Monday, December 17, 2012 05:08:17 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 23:17 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
(snip)
struct acpi_device_ops {
Index: linux/drivers/acpi/scan.c
26 matches
Mail list logo