Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: Switch to use list_entry_is_head() helper

2022-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 05:36:20PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 4:50 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 01:04:23PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > Since we got list_entry_is_head() helper in the generic header, > > > we may switch the ACPI

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: Switch to use list_entry_is_head() helper

2022-03-02 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 4:50 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 01:04:23PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Since we got list_entry_is_head() helper in the generic header, > > we may switch the ACPI modules to use it. This eliminates the > > need in additional variable. In some

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: Switch to use list_entry_is_head() helper

2022-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 01:04:23PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Since we got list_entry_is_head() helper in the generic header, > we may switch the ACPI modules to use it. This eliminates the > need in additional variable. In some cases it reduces critical > sections as well. Besides the work

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: Switch to use list_entry_is_head() helper

2022-02-11 Thread kernel test robot
Hi Andy, I love your patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on rafael-pm/linux-next] [also build test ERROR on nvdimm/libnvdimm-for-next v5.17-rc3 next-20220211] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use