On 21/12/2015 11:13, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 21.12.2015 um 10:23 schrieb Mickaël Salaün:
> Doesn't this break the support for changing syscall numbers using
> PTRACE_SETREGS?
The logic is unchanged except updating the UPT_SYSCALL_NR before
syscall_trace_enter(). I
Am 21.12.2015 um 10:23 schrieb Mickaël Salaün:
Doesn't this break the support for changing syscall numbers using
PTRACE_SETREGS?
>>>
>>> The logic is unchanged except updating the UPT_SYSCALL_NR before
>>> syscall_trace_enter(). I did my last tests with the x86_32 subarchitecture
>>>
On 21/12/2015 10:00, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> [sending the mail again, Thunderbird crashed :-\]
>
> Am 21.12.2015 um 09:49 schrieb Mickaël Salaün:
>>
>> On 21/12/2015 01:20, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> Am 21.12.2015 um 01:03 schrieb Mickaël Salaün:
diff --git
On 21/12/2015 01:20, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 21.12.2015 um 01:03 schrieb Mickaël Salaün:
>> diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c b/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c
>> index 1683b8e..65f0d1a 100644
>> --- a/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c
>> +++ b/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c
>> @@ -7,6
[sending the mail again, Thunderbird crashed :-\]
Am 21.12.2015 um 09:49 schrieb Mickaël Salaün:
>
> On 21/12/2015 01:20, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 21.12.2015 um 01:03 schrieb Mickaël Salaün:
>>> diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c b/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c
>>> index
Hi!
Am 21.12.2015 um 09:49 schrieb Mickaël Salaün:
>
> On 21/12/2015 01:20, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 21.12.2015 um 01:03 schrieb Mickaël Salaün:
>>> diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c b/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c
>>> index 1683b8e..65f0d1a 100644
>>> ---
On 21/12/2015 11:13, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 21.12.2015 um 10:23 schrieb Mickaël Salaün:
> Doesn't this break the support for changing syscall numbers using
> PTRACE_SETREGS?
The logic is unchanged except updating the UPT_SYSCALL_NR before
syscall_trace_enter(). I
On 21/12/2015 01:20, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 21.12.2015 um 01:03 schrieb Mickaël Salaün:
>> diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c b/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c
>> index 1683b8e..65f0d1a 100644
>> --- a/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c
>> +++ b/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c
>> @@ -7,6
Am 21.12.2015 um 10:23 schrieb Mickaël Salaün:
Doesn't this break the support for changing syscall numbers using
PTRACE_SETREGS?
>>>
>>> The logic is unchanged except updating the UPT_SYSCALL_NR before
>>> syscall_trace_enter(). I did my last tests with the x86_32 subarchitecture
>>>
[sending the mail again, Thunderbird crashed :-\]
Am 21.12.2015 um 09:49 schrieb Mickaël Salaün:
>
> On 21/12/2015 01:20, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 21.12.2015 um 01:03 schrieb Mickaël Salaün:
>>> diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c b/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c
>>> index
On 21/12/2015 10:00, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> [sending the mail again, Thunderbird crashed :-\]
>
> Am 21.12.2015 um 09:49 schrieb Mickaël Salaün:
>>
>> On 21/12/2015 01:20, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> Am 21.12.2015 um 01:03 schrieb Mickaël Salaün:
diff --git
Hi!
Am 21.12.2015 um 09:49 schrieb Mickaël Salaün:
>
> On 21/12/2015 01:20, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 21.12.2015 um 01:03 schrieb Mickaël Salaün:
>>> diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c b/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c
>>> index 1683b8e..65f0d1a 100644
>>> ---
Am 21.12.2015 um 01:03 schrieb Mickaël Salaün:
> This fix two related bugs:
> * PTRACE_GETREGS doesn't get the right orig_ax (syscall) value
> * PTRACE_SETREGS can't set the orig_ax value (erased by initial value)
>
> Remove the now useless and error-prone get_syscall().
>
> Signed-off-by:
Am 21.12.2015 um 01:03 schrieb Mickaël Salaün:
> This fix two related bugs:
> * PTRACE_GETREGS doesn't get the right orig_ax (syscall) value
> * PTRACE_SETREGS can't set the orig_ax value (erased by initial value)
>
> Remove the now useless and error-prone get_syscall().
>
> Signed-off-by:
14 matches
Mail list logo
