On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 08:53:55PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 03/14/2014 09:08 PM, David Miller wrote:
> >From: Alexei Starovoitov
> >Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:51:17 -0700
> >
> >>can you please explain why the status of these
> >>patches is 'deferred' in patchwork ?
> >>Is it because of
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 08:53:55PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 03/14/2014 09:08 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Alexei Starovoitov a...@plumgrid.com
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:51:17 -0700
can you please explain why the status of these
patches is 'deferred' in patchwork ?
Is it because of
On 03/14/2014 09:08 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Alexei Starovoitov
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:51:17 -0700
can you please explain why the status of these
patches is 'deferred' in patchwork ?
Is it because of bpf vs nft thread?
I think that's orthogonal.
I do not find it orthogonal, Pablo
On 03/14/2014 09:08 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Alexei Starovoitov a...@plumgrid.com
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:51:17 -0700
can you please explain why the status of these
patches is 'deferred' in patchwork ?
Is it because of bpf vs nft thread?
I think that's orthogonal.
I do not find it
From: Alexei Starovoitov
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:51:17 -0700
> can you please explain why the status of these
> patches is 'deferred' in patchwork ?
> Is it because of bpf vs nft thread?
> I think that's orthogonal.
I do not find it orthogonal, Pablo brings up some very valid points
which I
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 02:43:32PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
>>> index e568c8ef896b..6e6aab5e062b
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 02:43:32PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
>> index e568c8ef896b..6e6aab5e062b 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/filter.h
>> +++
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 02:43:32PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
> index e568c8ef896b..6e6aab5e062b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/filter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/filter.h
> @@ -25,20 +25,45 @@ struct sock;
> struct sk_filter
> {
>
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 02:43:32PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index e568c8ef896b..6e6aab5e062b 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -25,20 +25,45 @@ struct sock;
struct sk_filter
{
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso pa...@netfilter.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 02:43:32PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index e568c8ef896b..6e6aab5e062b 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Alexei Starovoitov a...@plumgrid.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso pa...@netfilter.org
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 02:43:32PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index
From: Alexei Starovoitov a...@plumgrid.com
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:51:17 -0700
can you please explain why the status of these
patches is 'deferred' in patchwork ?
Is it because of bpf vs nft thread?
I think that's orthogonal.
I do not find it orthogonal, Pablo brings up some very valid
12 matches
Mail list logo