Re: [PATCH v12 0/7] PHY framework

2013-09-28 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
On Saturday 28 September 2013 06:07 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:53:24AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Added a generic PHY framework that provides a set of APIs for the PHY drivers
>> to create/destroy a PHY and APIs for the PHY users to obtain a reference to
>> the PHY with or without using phandle.
>>
>> This framework will be of use only to devices that uses external PHY (PHY
>> functionality is not embedded within the controller).
>>
>> The intention of creating this framework is to bring the phy drivers spread
>> all over the Linux kernel to drivers/phy to increase code re-use and to
>> increase code maintainability.
>>
>> Comments to make PHY as bus wasn't done because PHY devices can be part of
>> other bus and making a same device attached to multiple bus leads to bad
>> design.
>>
>> If the PHY driver has to send notification on connect/disconnect, the PHY
>> driver should make use of the extcon framework. Using this susbsystem
>> to use extcon framwork will have to be analysed.
>>
>> You can find this patch series @
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kishon/linux-phy.git testing
>>
>> I'll create a new branch *next* once this patch series is finalized. All the
>> PHY driver development that depends on PHY framework can be based on this
>> branch.
>>
>> Did USB enumeration testing in panda and beagle after applying [1] (needed 
>> for
>> non-dt)
> 
> All now applied to my usb-next branch.  Thanks for redoing this many
> times and sticking with it.

Thanks :-)

-Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH v12 0/7] PHY framework

2013-09-28 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
On Saturday 28 September 2013 06:07 AM, Greg KH wrote:
 On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:53:24AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
 Added a generic PHY framework that provides a set of APIs for the PHY drivers
 to create/destroy a PHY and APIs for the PHY users to obtain a reference to
 the PHY with or without using phandle.

 This framework will be of use only to devices that uses external PHY (PHY
 functionality is not embedded within the controller).

 The intention of creating this framework is to bring the phy drivers spread
 all over the Linux kernel to drivers/phy to increase code re-use and to
 increase code maintainability.

 Comments to make PHY as bus wasn't done because PHY devices can be part of
 other bus and making a same device attached to multiple bus leads to bad
 design.

 If the PHY driver has to send notification on connect/disconnect, the PHY
 driver should make use of the extcon framework. Using this susbsystem
 to use extcon framwork will have to be analysed.

 You can find this patch series @
 git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kishon/linux-phy.git testing

 I'll create a new branch *next* once this patch series is finalized. All the
 PHY driver development that depends on PHY framework can be based on this
 branch.

 Did USB enumeration testing in panda and beagle after applying [1] (needed 
 for
 non-dt)
 
 All now applied to my usb-next branch.  Thanks for redoing this many
 times and sticking with it.

Thanks :-)

-Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH v12 0/7] PHY framework

2013-09-27 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:53:24AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Added a generic PHY framework that provides a set of APIs for the PHY drivers
> to create/destroy a PHY and APIs for the PHY users to obtain a reference to
> the PHY with or without using phandle.
> 
> This framework will be of use only to devices that uses external PHY (PHY
> functionality is not embedded within the controller).
> 
> The intention of creating this framework is to bring the phy drivers spread
> all over the Linux kernel to drivers/phy to increase code re-use and to
> increase code maintainability.
> 
> Comments to make PHY as bus wasn't done because PHY devices can be part of
> other bus and making a same device attached to multiple bus leads to bad
> design.
> 
> If the PHY driver has to send notification on connect/disconnect, the PHY
> driver should make use of the extcon framework. Using this susbsystem
> to use extcon framwork will have to be analysed.
> 
> You can find this patch series @
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kishon/linux-phy.git testing
> 
> I'll create a new branch *next* once this patch series is finalized. All the
> PHY driver development that depends on PHY framework can be based on this
> branch.
> 
> Did USB enumeration testing in panda and beagle after applying [1] (needed for
> non-dt)

All now applied to my usb-next branch.  Thanks for redoing this many
times and sticking with it.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH v12 0/7] PHY framework

2013-09-27 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:53:24AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
 Added a generic PHY framework that provides a set of APIs for the PHY drivers
 to create/destroy a PHY and APIs for the PHY users to obtain a reference to
 the PHY with or without using phandle.
 
 This framework will be of use only to devices that uses external PHY (PHY
 functionality is not embedded within the controller).
 
 The intention of creating this framework is to bring the phy drivers spread
 all over the Linux kernel to drivers/phy to increase code re-use and to
 increase code maintainability.
 
 Comments to make PHY as bus wasn't done because PHY devices can be part of
 other bus and making a same device attached to multiple bus leads to bad
 design.
 
 If the PHY driver has to send notification on connect/disconnect, the PHY
 driver should make use of the extcon framework. Using this susbsystem
 to use extcon framwork will have to be analysed.
 
 You can find this patch series @
 git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kishon/linux-phy.git testing
 
 I'll create a new branch *next* once this patch series is finalized. All the
 PHY driver development that depends on PHY framework can be based on this
 branch.
 
 Did USB enumeration testing in panda and beagle after applying [1] (needed for
 non-dt)

All now applied to my usb-next branch.  Thanks for redoing this many
times and sticking with it.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/