Re: [PATCH v2] sdhci-esdhc-imx: Correct two register accesses

2016-10-13 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 10 October 2016 at 20:39, Aaron Brice wrote: > > - The DMA error interrupt bit is in a different position as >compared to the sdhci standard. This is accounted for in >many cases, but not handled in the case of clearing the >INT_STATUS register by

Re: [PATCH v2] sdhci-esdhc-imx: Correct two register accesses

2016-10-13 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 10 October 2016 at 20:39, Aaron Brice wrote: > > - The DMA error interrupt bit is in a different position as >compared to the sdhci standard. This is accounted for in >many cases, but not handled in the case of clearing the >INT_STATUS register by writing a 1 to that location. >

Re: [PATCH v2] sdhci-esdhc-imx: Correct two register accesses

2016-10-11 Thread Adrian Hunter
On 10/10/16 21:39, Aaron Brice wrote: > - The DMA error interrupt bit is in a different position as >compared to the sdhci standard. This is accounted for in >many cases, but not handled in the case of clearing the >INT_STATUS register by writing a 1 to that location. > - The

Re: [PATCH v2] sdhci-esdhc-imx: Correct two register accesses

2016-10-11 Thread Adrian Hunter
On 10/10/16 21:39, Aaron Brice wrote: > - The DMA error interrupt bit is in a different position as >compared to the sdhci standard. This is accounted for in >many cases, but not handled in the case of clearing the >INT_STATUS register by writing a 1 to that location. > - The