Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support

2016-09-16 Thread Jan Glauber
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 08:55:24AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Jan, > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 11:11:32AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 04:04:59PM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:24:20AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 a

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support

2016-09-16 Thread Will Deacon
Hi Jan, On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 11:11:32AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 04:04:59PM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:24:20AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 05:21:02PM +0100, Jan Glauber wrote: > > > > This patch series provides

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support

2016-07-04 Thread Will Deacon
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 04:04:59PM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:24:20AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 05:21:02PM +0100, Jan Glauber wrote: > > > This patch series provides access to various counters on the ThunderX SOC. > > > > > > For details of t

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support

2016-06-28 Thread Jan Glauber
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:24:20AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Jan, > > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 05:21:02PM +0100, Jan Glauber wrote: > > This patch series provides access to various counters on the ThunderX SOC. > > > > For details of the uncore implementation see patch #1. > > > > Patches #2

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support

2016-06-28 Thread Will Deacon
Hi Jan, On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 05:21:02PM +0100, Jan Glauber wrote: > This patch series provides access to various counters on the ThunderX SOC. > > For details of the uncore implementation see patch #1. > > Patches #2-5 add the various ThunderX specific PMUs. > > As suggested I've put the fil

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support

2016-04-27 Thread Mark Rutland
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:51:56PM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 02:53:54PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > > That sounds like a good compromise. > > > > > > So I could do the following: > > > > > > 1) In the uncore setup check for CONFIG_NUMA, if set use

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support

2016-04-27 Thread Jan Glauber
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 02:53:54PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: [...] > > > > That sounds like a good compromise. > > > > So I could do the following: > > > > 1) In the uncore setup check for CONFIG_NUMA, if set use the NUMA > >information to determine the device node > > > > 2) If CONFIG_NU

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support

2016-04-26 Thread Will Deacon
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 02:08:09PM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 02:19:07PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 02:02:22PM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:22:07PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 02:19:54PM

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support

2016-04-26 Thread Jan Glauber
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 02:19:07PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 02:02:22PM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:22:07PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 02:19:54PM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote: > > > > can you have a look at these patche

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support

2016-04-25 Thread Will Deacon
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 02:02:22PM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:22:07PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 02:19:54PM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote: > > > can you have a look at these patches? > > > > Looks like Mark reviewed this last week -- are you planni

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support

2016-04-25 Thread Jan Glauber
Hi Will, On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:22:07PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Jan, > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 02:19:54PM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > > > can you have a look at these patches? > > Looks like Mark reviewed this last week -- are you planning to respin? > > Will Yes,

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support

2016-04-25 Thread Will Deacon
Hi Jan, On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 02:19:54PM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote: > Hi Mark, > > can you have a look at these patches? Looks like Mark reviewed this last week -- are you planning to respin? Will

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support

2016-04-19 Thread Mark Rutland
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:35:10PM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote: > Mark, > > are these patches still queued or should I repost them? Apologies for the delay. I've just given these a review. I note an awful lot of duplication over patches 2-5. The pmu::add implementations are practically identical, a

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support

2016-04-19 Thread Jan Glauber
Mark, are these patches still queued or should I repost them? --Jan On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 01:03:13PM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote: > Hi Mark, > > can you have a look at these patches? > > Thanks, > Jan > > 2016-03-09 17:21 GMT+01:00 Jan Glauber : > > This patch series provides access to va

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support

2016-04-04 Thread Jan Glauber
Hi Mark, can you have a look at these patches? Thanks, Jan On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 05:21:02PM +0100, Jan Glauber wrote: > This patch series provides access to various counters on the ThunderX SOC. > > For details of the uncore implementation see patch #1. > > Patches #2-5 add the various Thund