* Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 11/02/2018 00:39, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Using retpoline ensures the kernel is safe because it doesn't contain
> > any indirect branches, but firmware still can — and we make calls into
> > firmware at runtime. Where the IBRS microcode support is available, use
>
On 11/02/2018 00:39, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Using retpoline ensures the kernel is safe because it doesn't contain
> any indirect branches, but firmware still can — and we make calls into
> firmware at runtime. Where the IBRS microcode support is available, use
> that before calling into firmware.
Paolo, Radim,
* David Woodhouse wrote:
> David Woodhouse (4):
> KVM: x86: Reduce retpoline performance impact in slot_handle_level_range()
> KarimAllah Ahmed (2):
> X86/nVMX: Properly set spec_ctrl and pred_cmd before merging MSRs
> KVM/nVMX: Set the CPU_BASED_USE_MSR_BITMAPS if we have a
3 matches
Mail list logo