On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Linus Walleij
> wrote:
>> Argh! Now you're adding another user for a legacy custom pin control
>> implementation. But if noone is going to modernize PXA2xx what
>> can we do :-/
>
> I tried a ~year
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 13:43 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> Argh! Now you're adding another user for a legacy custom pin control
>> implementation. But if noone is going to modernize PXA2xx what
>> can we do :-/
>
> I've rewritten the
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Sergei Ianovich ynv...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 13:43 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
Argh! Now you're adding another user for a legacy custom pin control
implementation. But if noone is going to modernize PXA2xx what
can we do :-/
I've rewritten
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Vasily Khoruzhick anars...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org
wrote:
Argh! Now you're adding another user for a legacy custom pin control
implementation. But if noone is going to modernize PXA2xx what
can
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:43:27 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Argh! Now you're adding another user for a legacy custom pin control
> implementation. But if noone is going to modernize PXA2xx what can we do
> :-/
I plan to work on pxa2xx (pxa25x to be precise) after finishing with
sa1100 - my
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
>
>> ICP DAS calls LP-8x4x 'programmable automation controller'. It is
>> an industrial computer based on PXA270 SoC. They ship it with a 2.6.19
>> kernel and proprietary kernel module
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 13:43 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Argh! Now you're adding another user for a legacy custom pin control
> implementation. But if noone is going to modernize PXA2xx what
> can we do :-/
I've rewritten the device to use device tree and posted patch series for
that.
I will
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> ICP DAS calls LP-8x4x 'programmable automation controller'. It is
> an industrial computer based on PXA270 SoC. They ship it with a 2.6.19
> kernel and proprietary kernel module and userspace library to access
> its industrial IO.
OK...
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:43:27 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
Argh! Now you're adding another user for a legacy custom pin control
implementation. But if noone is going to modernize PXA2xx what can we do
:-/
I plan to work on pxa2xx (pxa25x to be precise) after finishing with
sa1100 - my second
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Sergei Ianovich ynv...@gmail.com wrote:
ICP DAS calls LP-8x4x 'programmable automation controller'. It is
an industrial computer based on PXA270 SoC. They ship it with a 2.6.19
kernel and proprietary kernel module and userspace library to access
its industrial
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 13:43 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
Argh! Now you're adding another user for a legacy custom pin control
implementation. But if noone is going to modernize PXA2xx what
can we do :-/
I've rewritten the device to use device tree and posted patch series for
that.
I will also
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Sergei Ianovich ynv...@gmail.com wrote:
ICP DAS calls LP-8x4x 'programmable automation controller'. It is
an industrial computer based on PXA270 SoC. They ship it with a 2.6.19
On Sunday 08 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-12-08 at 03:21 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 06 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> > You have some rather unusual options in here. I'd suggest you go through
> > the reduced defconfig file and remove all options
On Sunday 08 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
On Sun, 2013-12-08 at 03:21 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 06 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
You have some rather unusual options in here. I'd suggest you go through
the reduced defconfig file and remove all options that look
On Sun, 2013-12-08 at 03:21 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 06 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> You have some rather unusual options in here. I'd suggest you go through
> the reduced defconfig file and remove all options that look like they
> are unnecessary for your system.
>
>
On Friday 06 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..2612e60
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/lp8x4x_defconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
> +CONFIG_CROSS_COMPILE="arm-linux-gnueabi-"
This will break some build bots, please remove it here and add it to your
On Friday 06 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
new file mode 100644
index 000..2612e60
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/configs/lp8x4x_defconfig
@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
+CONFIG_CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi-
This will break some build bots, please remove it here and add it to your
build
On Sun, 2013-12-08 at 03:21 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 06 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
You have some rather unusual options in here. I'd suggest you go through
the reduced defconfig file and remove all options that look like they
are unnecessary for your system.
It's
18 matches
Mail list logo
