Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] i2c-designware: move to managed functions (devm_*)
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 01:36:36PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > From: Andy Shevchenko > > This makes the error handling much more simpler than open-coding everything > and in addition makes the probe function smaller and tidier. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg Whole series applied to for-next, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] i2c-designware: move to managed functions (devm_*)
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 01:36:36PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: From: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com This makes the error handling much more simpler than open-coding everything and in addition makes the probe function smaller and tidier. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com Whole series applied to for-next, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
