Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] mmc: sdhci-omap: Add SPDX identifier

2018-02-19 Thread Adrian Hunter
On 05/02/18 14:50, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used > instead of the full boiler plate text. Update sdhci-omap driver with the > correct SPDX license identifier. > > Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I

Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] mmc: sdhci-omap: Add SPDX identifier

2018-02-19 Thread Adrian Hunter
On 05/02/18 14:50, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used > instead of the full boiler plate text. Update sdhci-omap driver with the > correct SPDX license identifier. > > Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Acked-by: Adrian

Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] mmc: sdhci-omap: Add SPDX identifier

2018-02-05 Thread Joe Perches
(Adding Kate Stewart) On Mon, 2018-02-05 at 18:20 +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, As far as I know that "legally binding" bit is unproven. So maybe, maybe not. I don't doubt that it should be added, but I would be hesitant to state in a

Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] mmc: sdhci-omap: Add SPDX identifier

2018-02-05 Thread Joe Perches
(Adding Kate Stewart) On Mon, 2018-02-05 at 18:20 +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, As far as I know that "legally binding" bit is unproven. So maybe, maybe not. I don't doubt that it should be added, but I would be hesitant to state in a