On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:24:47PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 06:12:43PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > I think it would make more sense for you to merge that one together with
> > the related i2c changes. If you prefer that I take it through MFD,
> > please let me
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 06:12:43PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Mika,
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 06:32:37PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > The I2C core now prepares runtime PM on behalf of the I2C client device, so
> > only thing the driver needs to do is to call pm_runtime_put() at the
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 06:12:43PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
Hi Mika,
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 06:32:37PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
The I2C core now prepares runtime PM on behalf of the I2C client device, so
only thing the driver needs to do is to call pm_runtime_put() at the end of
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:24:47PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 06:12:43PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
I think it would make more sense for you to merge that one together with
the related i2c changes. If you prefer that I take it through MFD,
please let me know.
Hi Mika,
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 06:32:37PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> The I2C core now prepares runtime PM on behalf of the I2C client device, so
> only thing the driver needs to do is to call pm_runtime_put() at the end of
> its ->probe().
>
> This patch converts wm8994 driver to use this
Hi Mika,
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 06:32:37PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
The I2C core now prepares runtime PM on behalf of the I2C client device, so
only thing the driver needs to do is to call pm_runtime_put() at the end of
its -probe().
This patch converts wm8994 driver to use this
6 matches
Mail list logo