Re: [PATCH v2 BUGFIX] ARM: dts: imx6ull: fix the imx6ull-14x14-evk configuration

2018-02-07 Thread Shawn Guo 
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:52:18AM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> imx6ull-14x14-evk.dts currently includes the imx6ul.dtsi file for an
> i.MX6ULL SoC which is plain wrong.
> 
> Rename the current imx6ul-14x14-evk.dts to .dtsi and include it from
> imx6ul-14x14-evk.dts and imx6ull-14x14-evk.dts, so that both can
> include the appropriate SoC specific (imx6ul.dtsi/imx6ull.dtsi) file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann 

Applied, thanks.

Re: [PATCH v2 BUGFIX] ARM: dts: imx6ull: fix the imx6ull-14x14-evk configuration

2018-02-07 Thread Shawn Guo 
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:52:18AM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> imx6ull-14x14-evk.dts currently includes the imx6ul.dtsi file for an
> i.MX6ULL SoC which is plain wrong.
> 
> Rename the current imx6ul-14x14-evk.dts to .dtsi and include it from
> imx6ul-14x14-evk.dts and imx6ull-14x14-evk.dts, so that both can
> include the appropriate SoC specific (imx6ul.dtsi/imx6ull.dtsi) file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann 

Applied, thanks.

Re: [PATCH v2 BUGFIX] ARM: dts: imx6ull: fix the imx6ull-14x14-evk configuration

2018-02-05 Thread Lothar Waßmann 
Hi,

On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 18:37:20 +0800 Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 10:55:43AM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:56:22 +0800 Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:52:18AM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> > > > imx6ull-14x14-evk.dts currently includes the imx6ul.dtsi file for an
> > > > i.MX6ULL SoC which is plain wrong.
> > > > 
> > > > Rename the current imx6ul-14x14-evk.dts to .dtsi and include it from
> > > > imx6ul-14x14-evk.dts and imx6ull-14x14-evk.dts, so that both can
> > > > include the appropriate SoC specific (imx6ul.dtsi/imx6ull.dtsi) file.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann 
> > > 
> > > Which base is the patch generated against?  I cannot apply it to any
> > > branch in my tree.
> > >
> > The patch was generated against next-20180118 but also applies to
> > next-20180205.
> 
> It looks like you would really want this go into 4.16 as a fix?  In that
> case, I will need to wait for v4.16-rc1 to apply it.
> 
I don't care much when and how it will be applied.
I'm not using those files myself.


Lothar Waßmann

Re: [PATCH v2 BUGFIX] ARM: dts: imx6ull: fix the imx6ull-14x14-evk configuration

2018-02-05 Thread Lothar Waßmann 
Hi,

On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 18:37:20 +0800 Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 10:55:43AM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:56:22 +0800 Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:52:18AM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> > > > imx6ull-14x14-evk.dts currently includes the imx6ul.dtsi file for an
> > > > i.MX6ULL SoC which is plain wrong.
> > > > 
> > > > Rename the current imx6ul-14x14-evk.dts to .dtsi and include it from
> > > > imx6ul-14x14-evk.dts and imx6ull-14x14-evk.dts, so that both can
> > > > include the appropriate SoC specific (imx6ul.dtsi/imx6ull.dtsi) file.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann 
> > > 
> > > Which base is the patch generated against?  I cannot apply it to any
> > > branch in my tree.
> > >
> > The patch was generated against next-20180118 but also applies to
> > next-20180205.
> 
> It looks like you would really want this go into 4.16 as a fix?  In that
> case, I will need to wait for v4.16-rc1 to apply it.
> 
I don't care much when and how it will be applied.
I'm not using those files myself.


Lothar Waßmann

Re: [PATCH v2 BUGFIX] ARM: dts: imx6ull: fix the imx6ull-14x14-evk configuration

2018-02-05 Thread Shawn Guo 
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 10:55:43AM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:56:22 +0800 Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:52:18AM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> > > imx6ull-14x14-evk.dts currently includes the imx6ul.dtsi file for an
> > > i.MX6ULL SoC which is plain wrong.
> > > 
> > > Rename the current imx6ul-14x14-evk.dts to .dtsi and include it from
> > > imx6ul-14x14-evk.dts and imx6ull-14x14-evk.dts, so that both can
> > > include the appropriate SoC specific (imx6ul.dtsi/imx6ull.dtsi) file.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann 
> > 
> > Which base is the patch generated against?  I cannot apply it to any
> > branch in my tree.
> >
> The patch was generated against next-20180118 but also applies to
> next-20180205.

It looks like you would really want this go into 4.16 as a fix?  In that
case, I will need to wait for v4.16-rc1 to apply it.

Shawn

Re: [PATCH v2 BUGFIX] ARM: dts: imx6ull: fix the imx6ull-14x14-evk configuration

2018-02-05 Thread Shawn Guo 
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 10:55:43AM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:56:22 +0800 Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:52:18AM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> > > imx6ull-14x14-evk.dts currently includes the imx6ul.dtsi file for an
> > > i.MX6ULL SoC which is plain wrong.
> > > 
> > > Rename the current imx6ul-14x14-evk.dts to .dtsi and include it from
> > > imx6ul-14x14-evk.dts and imx6ull-14x14-evk.dts, so that both can
> > > include the appropriate SoC specific (imx6ul.dtsi/imx6ull.dtsi) file.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann 
> > 
> > Which base is the patch generated against?  I cannot apply it to any
> > branch in my tree.
> >
> The patch was generated against next-20180118 but also applies to
> next-20180205.

It looks like you would really want this go into 4.16 as a fix?  In that
case, I will need to wait for v4.16-rc1 to apply it.

Shawn

Re: [PATCH v2 BUGFIX] ARM: dts: imx6ull: fix the imx6ull-14x14-evk configuration

2018-02-05 Thread Lothar Waßmann 
Hi,

On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:56:22 +0800 Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:52:18AM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> > imx6ull-14x14-evk.dts currently includes the imx6ul.dtsi file for an
> > i.MX6ULL SoC which is plain wrong.
> > 
> > Rename the current imx6ul-14x14-evk.dts to .dtsi and include it from
> > imx6ul-14x14-evk.dts and imx6ull-14x14-evk.dts, so that both can
> > include the appropriate SoC specific (imx6ul.dtsi/imx6ull.dtsi) file.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann 
> 
> Which base is the patch generated against?  I cannot apply it to any
> branch in my tree.
>
The patch was generated against next-20180118 but also applies to
next-20180205.


Lothar Waßmann

Re: [PATCH v2 BUGFIX] ARM: dts: imx6ull: fix the imx6ull-14x14-evk configuration

2018-02-05 Thread Lothar Waßmann 
Hi,

On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:56:22 +0800 Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:52:18AM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> > imx6ull-14x14-evk.dts currently includes the imx6ul.dtsi file for an
> > i.MX6ULL SoC which is plain wrong.
> > 
> > Rename the current imx6ul-14x14-evk.dts to .dtsi and include it from
> > imx6ul-14x14-evk.dts and imx6ull-14x14-evk.dts, so that both can
> > include the appropriate SoC specific (imx6ul.dtsi/imx6ull.dtsi) file.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann 
> 
> Which base is the patch generated against?  I cannot apply it to any
> branch in my tree.
>
The patch was generated against next-20180118 but also applies to
next-20180205.


Lothar Waßmann

Re: [PATCH v2 BUGFIX] ARM: dts: imx6ull: fix the imx6ull-14x14-evk configuration

2018-02-04 Thread Shawn Guo 
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:52:18AM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> imx6ull-14x14-evk.dts currently includes the imx6ul.dtsi file for an
> i.MX6ULL SoC which is plain wrong.
> 
> Rename the current imx6ul-14x14-evk.dts to .dtsi and include it from
> imx6ul-14x14-evk.dts and imx6ull-14x14-evk.dts, so that both can
> include the appropriate SoC specific (imx6ul.dtsi/imx6ull.dtsi) file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann 

Which base is the patch generated against?  I cannot apply it to any
branch in my tree.

Shawn

Re: [PATCH v2 BUGFIX] ARM: dts: imx6ull: fix the imx6ull-14x14-evk configuration

2018-02-04 Thread Shawn Guo 
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:52:18AM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> imx6ull-14x14-evk.dts currently includes the imx6ul.dtsi file for an
> i.MX6ULL SoC which is plain wrong.
> 
> Rename the current imx6ul-14x14-evk.dts to .dtsi and include it from
> imx6ul-14x14-evk.dts and imx6ull-14x14-evk.dts, so that both can
> include the appropriate SoC specific (imx6ul.dtsi/imx6ull.dtsi) file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann 

Which base is the patch generated against?  I cannot apply it to any
branch in my tree.

Shawn