On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> On 7/16/2018 10:44 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> > > So, I think with the logic bug above it will work out properly, but
> > > let me know if I'm still missing something.
>
> Please give it thought to a case where very first suspend fails with your
> logic.
>
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> On 7/16/2018 10:44 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> > > So, I think with the logic bug above it will work out properly, but
> > > let me know if I'm still missing something.
>
> Please give it thought to a case where very first suspend fails with your
> logic.
>
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>
>
> On 7/16/2018 10:44 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:30 AM, John Stultz
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Mukesh Ojha
>>> wrote:
On 7/13/2018 10:50 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>
> On
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>
>
> On 7/16/2018 10:44 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:30 AM, John Stultz
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Mukesh Ojha
>>> wrote:
On 7/13/2018 10:50 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>
> On
On 7/16/2018 10:44 PM, John Stultz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:30 AM, John Stultz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
On 7/13/2018 10:50 PM, John Stultz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 12:13 AM, Mukesh Ojha
On 7/11/2018 1:43 AM, John Stultz wrote:
I worry
On 7/16/2018 10:44 PM, John Stultz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:30 AM, John Stultz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
On 7/13/2018 10:50 PM, John Stultz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 12:13 AM, Mukesh Ojha
On 7/11/2018 1:43 AM, John Stultz wrote:
I worry
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:30 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>> On 7/13/2018 10:50 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 12:13 AM, Mukesh Ojha
On 7/11/2018 1:43 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> I worry this upside-down logic is too
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:30 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>> On 7/13/2018 10:50 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 12:13 AM, Mukesh Ojha
On 7/11/2018 1:43 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> I worry this upside-down logic is too
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> On 7/13/2018 10:50 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 12:13 AM, Mukesh Ojha
>>> On 7/11/2018 1:43 AM, John Stultz wrote:
I worry this upside-down logic is too subtle to be easily reasoned
about, and will just lead to
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> On 7/13/2018 10:50 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 12:13 AM, Mukesh Ojha
>>> On 7/11/2018 1:43 AM, John Stultz wrote:
I worry this upside-down logic is too subtle to be easily reasoned
about, and will just lead to
On 7/13/2018 10:50 PM, John Stultz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 12:13 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
Hi John,
Thanks for your response
Please find my comments inline.
On 7/11/2018 1:43 AM, John Stultz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
Currently, there exists a corner
On 7/13/2018 10:50 PM, John Stultz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 12:13 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
Hi John,
Thanks for your response
Please find my comments inline.
On 7/11/2018 1:43 AM, John Stultz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
Currently, there exists a corner
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 12:13 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for your response
> Please find my comments inline.
>
>
> On 7/11/2018 1:43 AM, John Stultz wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>>>
>>> Currently, there exists a corner case assuming when there
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 12:13 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for your response
> Please find my comments inline.
>
>
> On 7/11/2018 1:43 AM, John Stultz wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>>>
>>> Currently, there exists a corner case assuming when there
Hi John,
Thanks for your response
Please find my comments inline.
On 7/11/2018 1:43 AM, John Stultz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
Currently, there exists a corner case assuming when there is
only one clocksource e.g RTC, and system failed to go to
suspend mode.
Hi John,
Thanks for your response
Please find my comments inline.
On 7/11/2018 1:43 AM, John Stultz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
Currently, there exists a corner case assuming when there is
only one clocksource e.g RTC, and system failed to go to
suspend mode.
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> Currently, there exists a corner case assuming when there is
> only one clocksource e.g RTC, and system failed to go to
> suspend mode. While resume rtc_resume() injects the sleeptime
> as timekeeping_rtc_skipresume() returned 'false' (default
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> Currently, there exists a corner case assuming when there is
> only one clocksource e.g RTC, and system failed to go to
> suspend mode. While resume rtc_resume() injects the sleeptime
> as timekeeping_rtc_skipresume() returned 'false' (default
18 matches
Mail list logo