Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] ACPI: AC: Clean up printing messages

2021-02-04 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi,

On 2/3/21 7:43 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki 
> 
> Replace the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_EXCEPTION() instances
> in ac.c with acpi_handle_debug() and acpi_handle_info() calls,
> respectively, which among other things causes the excessive log
> level of the messages previously printed via ACPI_EXCEPTION() to
> be increased.
> 
> Drop the _COMPONENT and ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definitions that are not
> used any more, drop the no longer needed ACPI_AC_COMPONENT definition
> from the headers and update the documentation accordingly.
> 
> While at it, replace the direct printk() invocation with pr_info(),
> add a pr_fmt() definition to ac.c and drop the unneeded PREFIX
> symbol definition from there.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 

Thanks, patch looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede 

Regards,

Hans


> ---
> 
> v2 -> v3: Also add a pr_fmt() definition to ac.c and replace direct
>   printk() with pr_info (no log level change).
> 
> v1 -> v2: Changelog update.
> 
> ---
>  Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/debug.rst |1 -
>  drivers/acpi/ac.c   |   23 ++-
>  drivers/acpi/sysfs.c|1 -
>  include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h |1 -
>  4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/debug.rst
> ===
> --- linux-pm.orig/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/debug.rst
> +++ linux-pm/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/debug.rst
> @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ shows the supported mask values, current
>  ACPI_CA_DISASSEMBLER0x0800
>  ACPI_COMPILER   0x1000
>  ACPI_TOOLS  0x2000
> -ACPI_AC_COMPONENT   0x0002
>  ACPI_BATTERY_COMPONENT  0x0004
>  ACPI_BUTTON_COMPONENT   0x0008
>  ACPI_SBS_COMPONENT  0x0010
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/ac.c
> ===
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/ac.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/ac.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
>   *  Copyright (C) 2001, 2002 Paul Diefenbaugh 
>   */
>  
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI: AC: " fmt
> +
>  #include 
>  #include 
>  #include 
> @@ -18,8 +20,6 @@
>  #include 
>  #include 
>  
> -#define PREFIX "ACPI: "
> -
>  #define ACPI_AC_CLASS"ac_adapter"
>  #define ACPI_AC_DEVICE_NAME  "AC Adapter"
>  #define ACPI_AC_FILE_STATE   "state"
> @@ -28,9 +28,6 @@
>  #define ACPI_AC_STATUS_ONLINE0x01
>  #define ACPI_AC_STATUS_UNKNOWN   0xFF
>  
> -#define _COMPONENT   ACPI_AC_COMPONENT
> -ACPI_MODULE_NAME("ac");
> -
>  MODULE_AUTHOR("Paul Diefenbaugh");
>  MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ACPI AC Adapter Driver");
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> @@ -102,8 +99,9 @@ static int acpi_ac_get_state(struct acpi
>   status = acpi_evaluate_integer(ac->device->handle, "_PSR", NULL,
>  >state);
>   if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> - ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status,
> - "Error reading AC Adapter state"));
> + acpi_handle_info(ac->device->handle,
> + "Error reading AC Adapter state: %s\n",
> + acpi_format_exception(status));
>   ac->state = ACPI_AC_STATUS_UNKNOWN;
>   return -ENODEV;
>   }
> @@ -153,8 +151,8 @@ static void acpi_ac_notify(struct acpi_d
>  
>   switch (event) {
>   default:
> - ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
> -   "Unsupported event [0x%x]\n", event));
> + acpi_handle_debug(device->handle, "Unsupported event [0x%x]\n",
> +   event);
>   fallthrough;
>   case ACPI_AC_NOTIFY_STATUS:
>   case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
> @@ -278,9 +276,8 @@ static int acpi_ac_add(struct acpi_devic
>   goto end;
>   }
>  
> - printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "%s [%s] (%s)\n",
> -acpi_device_name(device), acpi_device_bid(device),
> -ac->state ? "on-line" : "off-line");
> + pr_info("%s [%s] (%s)\n", acpi_device_name(device),
> + acpi_device_bid(device), ac->state ? "on-line" : "off-line");
>  
>   ac->battery_nb.notifier_call = acpi_ac_battery_notify;
>   register_acpi_notifier(>battery_nb);
> @@ -348,7 +345,7 @@ static int __init acpi_ac_init(void)
>   for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_ac_blacklist); i++)
>   if (acpi_dev_present(acpi_ac_blacklist[i].hid, "1",
>acpi_ac_blacklist[i].hrv)) {
> - pr_info(PREFIX "AC: found native %s PMIC, not 
> loading\n",
> + pr_info("found native %s PMIC, not loading\n",
>   

Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] ACPI: AC: Clean up printing messages

2021-02-03 Thread Hanjun Guo

On 2021/2/4 2:43, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

From: Rafael J. Wysocki 

Replace the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_EXCEPTION() instances
in ac.c with acpi_handle_debug() and acpi_handle_info() calls,
respectively, which among other things causes the excessive log
level of the messages previously printed via ACPI_EXCEPTION() to
be increased.

Drop the _COMPONENT and ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definitions that are not
used any more, drop the no longer needed ACPI_AC_COMPONENT definition
from the headers and update the documentation accordingly.

While at it, replace the direct printk() invocation with pr_info(),
add a pr_fmt() definition to ac.c and drop the unneeded PREFIX
symbol definition from there.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
---

v2 -> v3: Also add a pr_fmt() definition to ac.c and replace direct
   printk() with pr_info (no log level change).


Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo