On Mon, 2018-02-05 at 08:45 +, Horia Geantă wrote:
> On 2/2/2018 2:54 PM, Auer, Lukas wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 11:20 +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> > > On 01/02/18 12:16, Horia Geantă wrote:
> > > > If the loop cannot exit based on value of "ret" != -EAGAIN,
> > > > then it
> > > > me
On 2/2/2018 2:54 PM, Auer, Lukas wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 11:20 +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 01/02/18 12:16, Horia Geantă wrote:
>>> If the loop cannot exit based on value of "ret" != -EAGAIN, then it
>>> means
>>> caam_probe() will eventually fail due to ret == -EAGAIN:
>>> if (r
On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 11:20 +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 01/02/18 12:16, Horia Geantă wrote:
> > If the loop cannot exit based on value of "ret" != -EAGAIN, then it
> > means
> > caam_probe() will eventually fail due to ret == -EAGAIN:
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_err(dev, "failed
On 01/02/18 12:16, Horia Geantă wrote:
If the loop cannot exit based on value of "ret" != -EAGAIN, then it means
caam_probe() will eventually fail due to ret == -EAGAIN:
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to instantiate RNG");
goto caam_remove;
}
For
On 1/31/2018 4:00 AM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> commit 1005bccd7a4a ("crypto: caam - enable instantiation of all RNG4 state
> handles") introduces a control when incrementing ent_delay which contains
> the following comment above it:
>
> /*
> * If either SH were instantiated by somebody else
> *
5 matches
Mail list logo
