Hello, Andrew!
Can you, please, pull this patchset?
Thanks!
Roman
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 12:38:02PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 01:21:38PM +0100, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> >
> > From 466c35c36cae392cfee5e54a2884792972e789ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Roman
Hello, Andrew!
Can you, please, pull this patchset?
Thanks!
Roman
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 12:38:02PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 01:21:38PM +0100, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> >
> > From 466c35c36cae392cfee5e54a2884792972e789ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Roman
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 01:21:38PM +0100, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> Updated version below.
>
> --
>
> From 466c35c36cae392cfee5e54a2884792972e789ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Roman Gushchin
> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 19:31:35 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH v4 3/4] mm: treat memory.low
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 01:21:38PM +0100, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> Updated version below.
>
> --
>
> From 466c35c36cae392cfee5e54a2884792972e789ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Roman Gushchin
> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 19:31:35 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH v4 3/4] mm: treat memory.low value inclusive
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 03:45:26PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 07:59:20PM +0100, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > If memcg's usage is equal to the memory.low value, avoid reclaiming
> > from this cgroup while there is a surplus of reclaimable memory.
> >
> > This sounds more
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 03:45:26PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 07:59:20PM +0100, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > If memcg's usage is equal to the memory.low value, avoid reclaiming
> > from this cgroup while there is a surplus of reclaimable memory.
> >
> > This sounds more
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 07:59:20PM +0100, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> If memcg's usage is equal to the memory.low value, avoid reclaiming
> from this cgroup while there is a surplus of reclaimable memory.
>
> This sounds more logical and also matches memory.high and memory.max
> behavior: both are
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 07:59:20PM +0100, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> If memcg's usage is equal to the memory.low value, avoid reclaiming
> from this cgroup while there is a surplus of reclaimable memory.
>
> This sounds more logical and also matches memory.high and memory.max
> behavior: both are
8 matches
Mail list logo