On 15.03.2018 01:56, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 01:13:07AM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> This can be done if this function is modified to return only the CPU
>> equivalence table length (without the container header length), leaving
>> its single caller the job of
On 15.03.2018 01:56, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 01:13:07AM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> This can be done if this function is modified to return only the CPU
>> equivalence table length (without the container header length), leaving
>> its single caller the job of
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 01:13:07AM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> This can be done if this function is modified to return only the CPU
> equivalence table length (without the container header length), leaving
> its single caller the job of adding the container header length to skip
> to the
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 01:13:07AM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> This can be done if this function is modified to return only the CPU
> equivalence table length (without the container header length), leaving
> its single caller the job of adding the container header length to skip
> to the
On 15.03.2018 00:58, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:46:05AM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> The maximum possible value returned by install_equiv_cpu_table() of
>> UINT_MAX + CONTAINER_HDR_SZ comes from the maximum value of this 'size'
>> variable (that is UINT_MAX) plus
On 15.03.2018 00:58, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:46:05AM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> The maximum possible value returned by install_equiv_cpu_table() of
>> UINT_MAX + CONTAINER_HDR_SZ comes from the maximum value of this 'size'
>> variable (that is UINT_MAX) plus
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:46:05AM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> The maximum possible value returned by install_equiv_cpu_table() of
> UINT_MAX + CONTAINER_HDR_SZ comes from the maximum value of this 'size'
> variable (that is UINT_MAX) plus the header length of CONTAINER_HDR_SZ.
> This
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:46:05AM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> The maximum possible value returned by install_equiv_cpu_table() of
> UINT_MAX + CONTAINER_HDR_SZ comes from the maximum value of this 'size'
> variable (that is UINT_MAX) plus the header length of CONTAINER_HDR_SZ.
> This
On 14.03.2018 18:58, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:06:34PM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> The maximum possible value returned by install_equiv_cpu_table() is
>> UINT_MAX + CONTAINER_HDR_SZ (on a 64-bit kernel).
>> This is more than (signed) int type currently returned
On 14.03.2018 18:58, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:06:34PM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> The maximum possible value returned by install_equiv_cpu_table() is
>> UINT_MAX + CONTAINER_HDR_SZ (on a 64-bit kernel).
>> This is more than (signed) int type currently returned
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:06:34PM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> The maximum possible value returned by install_equiv_cpu_table() is
> UINT_MAX + CONTAINER_HDR_SZ (on a 64-bit kernel).
> This is more than (signed) int type currently returned by this function can
> hold so this function will
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:06:34PM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> The maximum possible value returned by install_equiv_cpu_table() is
> UINT_MAX + CONTAINER_HDR_SZ (on a 64-bit kernel).
> This is more than (signed) int type currently returned by this function can
> hold so this function will
12 matches
Mail list logo
