On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:45:54AM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> On 11/25/18 11:52 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
> > BTW, calling debug_objects_mem_init() before kmemleak_init() actually
> > could trigger a loop on machines with 160+ CPUs until the pool is filled
> > up,
> >
> > debug_objects_pool_min_level +=
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:45:54AM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> On 11/25/18 11:52 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
> > BTW, calling debug_objects_mem_init() before kmemleak_init() actually
> > could trigger a loop on machines with 160+ CPUs until the pool is filled
> > up,
> >
> > debug_objects_pool_min_level +=
On 11/25/18 11:52 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
On 11/25/18 8:31 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
On 11/25/2018 03:42 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
On 11/23/18 10:01 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
On Nov 22, 2018, at 4:56 PM, Thomas Gleixner
wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Qian Cai wrote:
Looking deeper at that.
diff
On 11/25/18 11:52 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
On 11/25/18 8:31 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
On 11/25/2018 03:42 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
On 11/23/18 10:01 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
On Nov 22, 2018, at 4:56 PM, Thomas Gleixner
wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Qian Cai wrote:
Looking deeper at that.
diff
On 11/25/18 8:31 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
On 11/25/2018 03:42 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
On 11/23/18 10:01 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
On Nov 22, 2018, at 4:56 PM, Thomas Gleixner
wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Qian Cai wrote:
Looking deeper at that.
diff --git a/lib/debugobjects.c
On 11/25/18 8:31 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
On 11/25/2018 03:42 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
On 11/23/18 10:01 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
On Nov 22, 2018, at 4:56 PM, Thomas Gleixner
wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Qian Cai wrote:
Looking deeper at that.
diff --git a/lib/debugobjects.c
On 11/25/2018 03:42 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
>
>
> On 11/23/18 10:01 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 22, 2018, at 4:56 PM, Thomas Gleixner
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Qian Cai wrote:
>>>
>>> Looking deeper at that.
>>>
diff --git a/lib/debugobjects.c b/lib/debugobjects.c
On 11/25/2018 03:42 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
>
>
> On 11/23/18 10:01 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 22, 2018, at 4:56 PM, Thomas Gleixner
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Qian Cai wrote:
>>>
>>> Looking deeper at that.
>>>
diff --git a/lib/debugobjects.c b/lib/debugobjects.c
On 11/22/18 4:56 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Qian Cai wrote:
Looking deeper at that.
diff --git a/lib/debugobjects.c b/lib/debugobjects.c
index 70935ed91125..140571aa483c 100644
--- a/lib/debugobjects.c
+++ b/lib/debugobjects.c
@@ -23,9 +23,81 @@
#define
On 11/22/18 4:56 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Qian Cai wrote:
Looking deeper at that.
diff --git a/lib/debugobjects.c b/lib/debugobjects.c
index 70935ed91125..140571aa483c 100644
--- a/lib/debugobjects.c
+++ b/lib/debugobjects.c
@@ -23,9 +23,81 @@
#define
On 11/23/18 10:01 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
On Nov 22, 2018, at 4:56 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Qian Cai wrote:
Looking deeper at that.
diff --git a/lib/debugobjects.c b/lib/debugobjects.c
index 70935ed91125..140571aa483c 100644
--- a/lib/debugobjects.c
+++
On 11/23/18 10:01 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
On Nov 22, 2018, at 4:56 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Qian Cai wrote:
Looking deeper at that.
diff --git a/lib/debugobjects.c b/lib/debugobjects.c
index 70935ed91125..140571aa483c 100644
--- a/lib/debugobjects.c
+++
> On Nov 22, 2018, at 4:56 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Qian Cai wrote:
>
> Looking deeper at that.
>
>> diff --git a/lib/debugobjects.c b/lib/debugobjects.c
>> index 70935ed91125..140571aa483c 100644
>> --- a/lib/debugobjects.c
>> +++ b/lib/debugobjects.c
>> @@ -23,9
> On Nov 22, 2018, at 4:56 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Qian Cai wrote:
>
> Looking deeper at that.
>
>> diff --git a/lib/debugobjects.c b/lib/debugobjects.c
>> index 70935ed91125..140571aa483c 100644
>> --- a/lib/debugobjects.c
>> +++ b/lib/debugobjects.c
>> @@ -23,9
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Qian Cai wrote:
Looking deeper at that.
> diff --git a/lib/debugobjects.c b/lib/debugobjects.c
> index 70935ed91125..140571aa483c 100644
> --- a/lib/debugobjects.c
> +++ b/lib/debugobjects.c
> @@ -23,9 +23,81 @@
> #define ODEBUG_HASH_BITS 14
> #define ODEBUG_HASH_SIZE
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Qian Cai wrote:
Looking deeper at that.
> diff --git a/lib/debugobjects.c b/lib/debugobjects.c
> index 70935ed91125..140571aa483c 100644
> --- a/lib/debugobjects.c
> +++ b/lib/debugobjects.c
> @@ -23,9 +23,81 @@
> #define ODEBUG_HASH_BITS 14
> #define ODEBUG_HASH_SIZE
On 11/20/2018 09:11 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
> The current value of the early boot static pool size is not big enough
> for systems with large number of CPUs with timer or/and workqueue
> objects selected. As the results, systems have 60+ CPUs with both timer
> and workqueue objects enabled could
On 11/20/2018 09:11 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
> The current value of the early boot static pool size is not big enough
> for systems with large number of CPUs with timer or/and workqueue
> objects selected. As the results, systems have 60+ CPUs with both timer
> and workqueue objects enabled could
18 matches
Mail list logo