Hi HPA,
Would you please tell me if this patch-set has been merged
into any tree or branch ?
If not merged, I'll rebased it to the latest kernel and
resend it again. Hope the rebasing will help to push this
patch-set.
Thanks. :)
On 05/22/2013 01:18 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Sorry, just have
Hi HPA,
Would you please tell me if this patch-set has been merged
into any tree or branch ?
If not merged, I'll rebased it to the latest kernel and
resend it again. Hope the rebasing will help to push this
patch-set.
Thanks. :)
On 05/22/2013 01:18 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Sorry, just have
Sorry, just have been swamped since -rc1 came out.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
On 05/10/2013 02:24 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
..
If you have any thinking of this patch-set, please let me know.
Talked to HPA, and he will put my patchset into tip/x86/mm after v3.10-rc1.
after that we can work on put pagetable on local node for hotadd path.
Hi,
It is Linux v3.10-rc2
On 05/10/2013 02:24 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
..
If you have any thinking of this patch-set, please let me know.
Talked to HPA, and he will put my patchset into tip/x86/mm after v3.10-rc1.
after that we can work on put pagetable on local node for hotadd path.
Hi,
It is Linux v3.10-rc2
Sorry, just have been swamped since -rc1 came out.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
Hi Yinghai,
How do you think of the following problem and solutions ?
And can we not allocate pagetable to local node when MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
is enabled for now, and do it again when the problem in hot-remove
path is fixed ?
Thanks. :)
On 05/13/2013 10:59 AM, Tang Chen wrote:
Hi Yinghai,
On
Hi Yinghai,
How do you think of the following problem and solutions ?
And can we not allocate pagetable to local node when MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
is enabled for now, and do it again when the problem in hot-remove
path is fixed ?
Thanks. :)
On 05/13/2013 10:59 AM, Tang Chen wrote:
Hi Yinghai,
On
Hi Yinghai,
On 05/10/2013 02:24 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
So I suggest to separate the job into 2 parts:
1. Push Yinghai's patch1 ~ patch20, without putting pagetable in local
node.
And push my work to use SRAT to arrange ZONE_MOVABLE.
In this case, we can enable memory hotplug in the kernel first.
Hi Yinghai,
On 05/10/2013 02:24 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
So I suggest to separate the job into 2 parts:
1. Push Yinghai's patch1 ~ patch20, without putting pagetable in local
node.
And push my work to use SRAT to arrange ZONE_MOVABLE.
In this case, we can enable memory hotplug in the kernel first.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Tang Chen wrote:
> Hi Yinghai,
>
>
> On 04/30/2013 03:21 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
>>
>> So I suggest to separate the job into 2 parts:
>> 1. Push Yinghai's patch1 ~ patch20, without putting pagetable in local
>> node.
>> And push my work to use SRAT to arrange
Hi Yinghai,
On 04/30/2013 03:21 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
So I suggest to separate the job into 2 parts:
1. Push Yinghai's patch1 ~ patch20, without putting pagetable in local node.
And push my work to use SRAT to arrange ZONE_MOVABLE.
In this case, we can enable memory hotplug in the kernel first.
Hi Yinghai,
On 04/30/2013 03:21 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
So I suggest to separate the job into 2 parts:
1. Push Yinghai's patch1 ~ patch20, without putting pagetable in local node.
And push my work to use SRAT to arrange ZONE_MOVABLE.
In this case, we can enable memory hotplug in the kernel first.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Tang Chen tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
Hi Yinghai,
On 04/30/2013 03:21 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
So I suggest to separate the job into 2 parts:
1. Push Yinghai's patch1 ~ patch20, without putting pagetable in local
node.
And push my work to use SRAT to arrange
Hi all,
Could anyone give some suggestions to this patch-set ?
Thanks.
On 04/30/2013 03:21 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
Hi Yinghai, all,
I've tested this patch-set with my following patch-set:
[PATCH v1 00/12] Arrange hotpluggable memory in SRAT as ZONE_MOVABLE.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/19/94
Hi all,
Could anyone give some suggestions to this patch-set ?
Thanks.
On 04/30/2013 03:21 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
Hi Yinghai, all,
I've tested this patch-set with my following patch-set:
[PATCH v1 00/12] Arrange hotpluggable memory in SRAT as ZONE_MOVABLE.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/19/94
Hi Yinghai, all,
I've tested this patch-set with my following patch-set:
[PATCH v1 00/12] Arrange hotpluggable memory in SRAT as ZONE_MOVABLE.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/19/94
Using ACPI table override, I overrided SRAT on my box like this:
[0.00] SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem
Hi Yinghai, all,
I've tested this patch-set with my following patch-set:
[PATCH v1 00/12] Arrange hotpluggable memory in SRAT as ZONE_MOVABLE.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/19/94
Using ACPI table override, I overrided SRAT on my box like this:
[0.00] SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem
Hi Yinghai,
It has been a long time since this patch-set was sent. I think we need to
do something to push it.
In my understanding, this patch-set did 2 things.
1. Parse numa info earlier, some improvements for
ACPI_INITRD_TABLE_OVERRIDE.
(patch1 ~ patch20)
2. Allocate pagetable in local
Hi Yinghai,
It has been a long time since this patch-set was sent. I think we need to
do something to push it.
In my understanding, this patch-set did 2 things.
1. Parse numa info earlier, some improvements for
ACPI_INITRD_TABLE_OVERRIDE.
(patch1 ~ patch20)
2. Allocate pagetable in local
20 matches
Mail list logo
