On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 08:51:16AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 1:49 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 08:14:34PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 05:22:35PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
And do we have a way to add a rule to 0-day to catch these
On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 08:51:16AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 1:49 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 08:14:34PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 05:22:35PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
And do we have a way to add a rule to 0-day to catch these
On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 1:49 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 08:14:34PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 05:22:35PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>>> And do we have a way to add a rule to 0-day to catch these so that they
>>> get a warning when they are added
On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 1:49 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 08:14:34PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 05:22:35PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>>> And do we have a way to add a rule to 0-day to catch these so that they
>>> get a warning when they are added
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 08:14:34PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 05:22:35PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 05:04:16PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:35:59PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 08:14:34PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 05:22:35PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 05:04:16PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:35:59PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 05:22:35PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 05:04:16PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:35:59PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > >> As done treewide earlier, this catches several more
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 05:22:35PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 05:04:16PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:35:59PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > >> As done treewide earlier, this catches several more
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 05:04:16PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:35:59PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> As done treewide earlier, this catches several more open-coded
> >> allocation size calculations that were added to the
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 05:04:16PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:35:59PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> As done treewide earlier, this catches several more open-coded
> >> allocation size calculations that were added to the
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:35:59PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> As done treewide earlier, this catches several more open-coded
>> allocation size calculations that were added to the kernel during the
>> merge window. This performs the following
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:35:59PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> As done treewide earlier, this catches several more open-coded
>> allocation size calculations that were added to the kernel during the
>> merge window. This performs the following
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:35:59PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> As done treewide earlier, this catches several more open-coded
> allocation size calculations that were added to the kernel during the
> merge window. This performs the following mechanical transformations
> using Coccinelle:
>
>
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:35:59PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> As done treewide earlier, this catches several more open-coded
> allocation size calculations that were added to the kernel during the
> merge window. This performs the following mechanical transformations
> using Coccinelle:
>
>
14 matches
Mail list logo