Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] KVM/ARM: Some vgic fixes and init sequence KVM selftests
Hi Marc, On 4/5/21 12:12 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On Sun, 04 Apr 2021 18:22:35 +0100, > Eric Auger wrote: >> >> While writting vgic v3 init sequence KVM selftests I noticed some >> relatively minor issues. This was also the opportunity to try to >> fix the issue laterly reported by Zenghui, related to the RDIST_TYPER >> last bit emulation. The final patch is a first batch of VGIC init >> sequence selftests. Of course they can be augmented with a lot more >> register access tests, but let's try to move forward incrementally ... >> >> Best Regards >> >> Eric >> >> This series can be found at: >> https://github.com/eauger/linux/tree/vgic_kvmselftests_v5 >> >> History: >> v4 -> v5: >> - rewrite the last bit detection according to Marc's >> interpretation of the spec and modify the kvm selftests >> accordingly > > Have you dropped v4's patch #1? It did seem to fix an actual issue, > didn't it? Hum no that was not my intent :-( Resending ... Eric > > Thanks, > > M. >
Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] KVM/ARM: Some vgic fixes and init sequence KVM selftests
Hi Eric, On Sun, 04 Apr 2021 18:22:35 +0100, Eric Auger wrote: > > While writting vgic v3 init sequence KVM selftests I noticed some > relatively minor issues. This was also the opportunity to try to > fix the issue laterly reported by Zenghui, related to the RDIST_TYPER > last bit emulation. The final patch is a first batch of VGIC init > sequence selftests. Of course they can be augmented with a lot more > register access tests, but let's try to move forward incrementally ... > > Best Regards > > Eric > > This series can be found at: > https://github.com/eauger/linux/tree/vgic_kvmselftests_v5 > > History: > v4 -> v5: > - rewrite the last bit detection according to Marc's > interpretation of the spec and modify the kvm selftests > accordingly Have you dropped v4's patch #1? It did seem to fix an actual issue, didn't it? Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
