Hi Jacek,
On 30 August 2018 at 11:26, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Hi Jacek,
>
> On 30 August 2018 at 03:15, Jacek Anaszewski
> wrote:
>> Hi Baolin,
>>
>> On 08/29/2018 11:48 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>> Hi Jacek,
>>>
>>> On 29 August 2018 at 04:25, Jacek Anaszewski
>>> wrote:
On 08/25/2018 09:51
Hi Jacek,
On 30 August 2018 at 03:15, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Hi Baolin,
>
> On 08/29/2018 11:48 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> Hi Jacek,
>>
>> On 29 August 2018 at 04:25, Jacek Anaszewski
>> wrote:
>>> On 08/25/2018 09:51 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
On 25 August 2018 at 04:44, Jacek Anaszewski
Hi Baolin,
On 08/29/2018 11:48 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Hi Jacek,
>
> On 29 August 2018 at 04:25, Jacek Anaszewski
> wrote:
>> On 08/25/2018 09:51 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>> On 25 August 2018 at 04:44, Jacek Anaszewski
>>> wrote:
On 08/24/2018 10:12 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2
On 08/28/2018 11:13 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue 28 Aug 13:25 PDT 2018, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>
>> On 08/25/2018 09:51 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>> On 25 August 2018 at 04:44, Jacek Anaszewski
>>> wrote:
On 08/24/2018 10:12 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2018-08-24 21:49:50, Ja
Hi Jacek,
On 29 August 2018 at 04:25, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> On 08/25/2018 09:51 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> On 25 August 2018 at 04:44, Jacek Anaszewski
>> wrote:
>>> On 08/24/2018 10:12 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Fri 2018-08-24 21:49:50, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
>>>
On Tue 28 Aug 13:25 PDT 2018, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> On 08/25/2018 09:51 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > On 25 August 2018 at 04:44, Jacek Anaszewski
> > wrote:
> >> On 08/24/2018 10:12 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >>> On Fri 2018-08-24 21:49:50, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
>
On Sat 25 Aug 00:51 PDT 2018, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On 25 August 2018 at 04:44, Jacek Anaszewski
> wrote:
> > On 08/24/2018 10:12 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> On Fri 2018-08-24 21:49:50, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> >>> Hi Pavel,
> >>>
> >>> On 08/24/2018 12:11 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
[..]
> >>> +
On 08/25/2018 09:51 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On 25 August 2018 at 04:44, Jacek Anaszewski
> wrote:
>> On 08/24/2018 10:12 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> On Fri 2018-08-24 21:49:50, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
Hi Pavel,
On 08/24/2018 12:11 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> I t
On 25 August 2018 at 04:44, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> On 08/24/2018 10:12 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> On Fri 2018-08-24 21:49:50, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>> Hi Pavel,
>>>
>>> On 08/24/2018 12:11 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
> I think that it would be more flexible if software pattern
On 08/24/2018 10:12 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2018-08-24 21:49:50, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> Hi Pavel,
>>
>> On 08/24/2018 12:11 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
I think that it would be more flexible if software pattern fallback
was applied in case of pattern_set failure. Othe
On Fri 2018-08-24 21:49:50, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> On 08/24/2018 12:11 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >> I think that it would be more flexible if software pattern fallback
> >> was applied in case of pattern_set failure. Otherwise, it would
> >> lead to the situation wher
Hi Pavel,
On 08/24/2018 12:11 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> I think that it would be more flexible if software pattern fallback
>> was applied in case of pattern_set failure. Otherwise, it would
>> lead to the situation where LED class devices that support hardware
>> blinking couldn't be ap
Hi!
> I think that it would be more flexible if software pattern fallback
> was applied in case of pattern_set failure. Otherwise, it would
> lead to the situation where LED class devices that support hardware
> blinking couldn't be applied the same set of patterns as LED class
> devices that don'
Hi Jacek,
On 11 August 2018 at 02:10, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Hi Baolin,
>
> On 08/10/2018 05:26 PM, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> Hi Jacek,
>>
>> On 9 August 2018 at 21:21, Jacek Anaszewski
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Baolin,
>>>
>>> On 08/09/2018 07:48 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>> [...]
+static int pat
Hi Baolin,
On 08/10/2018 05:26 PM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Hi Jacek,
>
> On 9 August 2018 at 21:21, Jacek Anaszewski
> wrote:
>> Hi Baolin,
>>
>> On 08/09/2018 07:48 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> [...]
>>> +static int pattern_trig_start_pattern(struct pattern_trig_data *data,
>>> +
Hi Jacek,
On 9 August 2018 at 21:21, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Hi Baolin,
>
> On 08/09/2018 07:48 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> [...]
>> +static int pattern_trig_start_pattern(struct pattern_trig_data *data,
>> + struct led_classdev *led_cdev)
>> +{
>>
Hi Baolin,
On 08/09/2018 07:48 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
[...]
> +static int pattern_trig_start_pattern(struct pattern_trig_data *data,
> + struct led_classdev *led_cdev)
> +{
> + if (!data->npatterns)
> + return 0;
> +
> +
Hi Jacek,
On 9 August 2018 at 05:28, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Hi Baolin,
>
> On 08/08/2018 08:01 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> Hi Jacek,
>>
>> On 8 August 2018 at 05:54, Jacek Anaszewski
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Baolin,
>>>
>>> Thank you for addressing the review remarks.
>>> Since the patch set is target
Hi Baolin,
On 08/08/2018 08:01 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Hi Jacek,
>
> On 8 August 2018 at 05:54, Jacek Anaszewski
> wrote:
>> Hi Baolin,
>>
>> Thank you for addressing the review remarks.
>> Since the patch set is targeted for 4.19, then we have three weeks
>> before it will be merged to the fo
Hi Jacek,
On 8 August 2018 at 05:54, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Hi Baolin,
>
> Thank you for addressing the review remarks.
> Since the patch set is targeted for 4.19, then we have three weeks
> before it will be merged to the for-next anyway. That said, I propose
> one more modification, please t
Hi Baolin,
Thank you for addressing the review remarks.
Since the patch set is targeted for 4.19, then we have three weeks
before it will be merged to the for-next anyway. That said, I propose
one more modification, please take a look below.
On 08/06/2018 02:05 PM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Some LED c
21 matches
Mail list logo
