On Monday 19 September 2016 01:16 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:09:10PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
On Friday 09 September 2016 02:17 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
We had an agreement that keep mmc's pwrseq framework unchanging.
Unless Ulf and rob both agree to
On Monday 19 September 2016 01:16 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:09:10PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
On Friday 09 September 2016 02:17 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
We had an agreement that keep mmc's pwrseq framework unchanging.
Unless Ulf and rob both agree to
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:09:10PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>
>
> On Friday 09 September 2016 02:17 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >[...]
> >
> >We had an agreement that keep mmc's pwrseq framework unchanging.
> >Unless Ulf and rob both agree to change.
> Why 2 separate approach for
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:09:10PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>
>
> On Friday 09 September 2016 02:17 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >[...]
> >
> >We had an agreement that keep mmc's pwrseq framework unchanging.
> >Unless Ulf and rob both agree to change.
> Why 2 separate approach for
On Friday 09 September 2016 02:17 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
We had an agreement that keep mmc's pwrseq framework unchanging.
Unless Ulf and rob both agree to change.
Why 2 separate approach for same problem ?
And I see this as possible duplication of code/functionality :)
How the new
On Friday 09 September 2016 02:17 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
We had an agreement that keep mmc's pwrseq framework unchanging.
Unless Ulf and rob both agree to change.
Why 2 separate approach for same problem ?
And I see this as possible duplication of code/functionality :)
How the new
[...]
We had an agreement that keep mmc's pwrseq framework unchanging.
Unless Ulf and rob both agree to change.
>>>
>>> Why 2 separate approach for same problem ?
>>> And I see this as possible duplication of code/functionality :)
>>
>> How the new kernel compatibles old dts? If we
[...]
We had an agreement that keep mmc's pwrseq framework unchanging.
Unless Ulf and rob both agree to change.
>>>
>>> Why 2 separate approach for same problem ?
>>> And I see this as possible duplication of code/functionality :)
>>
>> How the new kernel compatibles old dts? If we
a
On Friday 02 September 2016 06:40 AM, Peter Chen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:28:20PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
On Wednesday 31 August 2016 03:22 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 01:46:30PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
On Monday 29 August 2016 04:40 PM, Peter Chen
a
On Friday 02 September 2016 06:40 AM, Peter Chen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:28:20PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
On Wednesday 31 August 2016 03:22 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 01:46:30PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
On Monday 29 August 2016 04:40 PM, Peter Chen
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:28:20PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday 31 August 2016 03:22 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 01:46:30PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> >>
> >>On Monday 29 August 2016 04:40 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:28:20PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday 31 August 2016 03:22 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 01:46:30PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> >>
> >>On Monday 29 August 2016 04:40 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at
On Wednesday 31 August 2016 03:22 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 01:46:30PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
On Monday 29 August 2016 04:40 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:53:35PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:02:48PM +0530, Vaibhav
On Wednesday 31 August 2016 03:22 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 01:46:30PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
On Monday 29 August 2016 04:40 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:53:35PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:02:48PM +0530, Vaibhav
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 01:46:30PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>
>
> On Monday 29 August 2016 04:40 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:53:35PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> >>On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:02:48PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> >>>On Monday 15 August 2016 02:43
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 01:46:30PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>
>
> On Monday 29 August 2016 04:40 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:53:35PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> >>On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:02:48PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> >>>On Monday 15 August 2016 02:43
On Monday 29 August 2016 04:40 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:53:35PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:02:48PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
On Monday 15 August 2016 02:43 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
Hi all,
This is a follow-up for my last power sequence
On Monday 29 August 2016 04:40 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:53:35PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:02:48PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
On Monday 15 August 2016 02:43 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
Hi all,
This is a follow-up for my last power sequence
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:53:35PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:02:48PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Monday 15 August 2016 02:43 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
> > >Hi all,
> > >
> > >This is a follow-up for my last power sequence framework patch set [1].
> >
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:53:35PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:02:48PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Monday 15 August 2016 02:43 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
> > >Hi all,
> > >
> > >This is a follow-up for my last power sequence framework patch set [1].
> >
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:02:48PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>
>
> On Monday 15 August 2016 02:43 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >This is a follow-up for my last power sequence framework patch set [1].
> >According to Rob Herring and Ulf Hansson's comments[2], I use a generic
>
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:02:48PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>
>
> On Monday 15 August 2016 02:43 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >This is a follow-up for my last power sequence framework patch set [1].
> >According to Rob Herring and Ulf Hansson's comments[2], I use a generic
>
On Monday 15 August 2016 02:43 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
Hi all,
This is a follow-up for my last power sequence framework patch set [1].
According to Rob Herring and Ulf Hansson's comments[2], I use a generic
power sequence library for parsing the power sequence elements on DT,
and implement
On Monday 15 August 2016 02:43 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
Hi all,
This is a follow-up for my last power sequence framework patch set [1].
According to Rob Herring and Ulf Hansson's comments[2], I use a generic
power sequence library for parsing the power sequence elements on DT,
and implement
24 matches
Mail list logo