On Thu 08-11-12 12:05:13, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 06-11-12 09:03:54, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 05-11-12 16:28:37, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:07:35 +0400
> > > Glauber Costa wrote:
> > >
> > > > +static __always_inline struct kmem_cache *
> > > >
On Tue 06-11-12 09:03:54, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 05-11-12 16:28:37, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:07:35 +0400
> > Glauber Costa wrote:
> >
> > > +static __always_inline struct kmem_cache *
> > > +memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp)
> >
> > I still
On Tue 06-11-12 09:03:54, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Mon 05-11-12 16:28:37, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:07:35 +0400
Glauber Costa glom...@parallels.com wrote:
+static __always_inline struct kmem_cache *
+memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp)
I
On Thu 08-11-12 12:05:13, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Tue 06-11-12 09:03:54, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Mon 05-11-12 16:28:37, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:07:35 +0400
Glauber Costa glom...@parallels.com wrote:
+static __always_inline struct kmem_cache *
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:04:03 +0100 Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 11/06/2012 01:28 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:07:35 +0400
> > Glauber Costa wrote:
> >
> >> +static __always_inline struct kmem_cache *
> >> +memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp)
> >
> > I
On 11/06/2012 01:28 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:07:35 +0400
> Glauber Costa wrote:
>
>> +static __always_inline struct kmem_cache *
>> +memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp)
>
> I still don't understand why this code uses __always_inline so much.
>
>
On Mon 05-11-12 16:28:37, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:07:35 +0400
> Glauber Costa wrote:
>
> > +static __always_inline struct kmem_cache *
> > +memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp)
>
> I still don't understand why this code uses __always_inline so much.
On Mon 05-11-12 16:28:37, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:07:35 +0400
Glauber Costa glom...@parallels.com wrote:
+static __always_inline struct kmem_cache *
+memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp)
I still don't understand why this code uses
On 11/06/2012 01:28 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:07:35 +0400
Glauber Costa glom...@parallels.com wrote:
+static __always_inline struct kmem_cache *
+memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp)
I still don't understand why this code uses __always_inline so
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:04:03 +0100 Glauber Costa glom...@parallels.com wrote:
On 11/06/2012 01:28 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:07:35 +0400
Glauber Costa glom...@parallels.com wrote:
+static __always_inline struct kmem_cache *
+memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:07:35 +0400
Glauber Costa wrote:
> +static __always_inline struct kmem_cache *
> +memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp)
I still don't understand why this code uses __always_inline so much.
I don't recall seeing the compiler producing out-of-line
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:07:35 +0400
Glauber Costa glom...@parallels.com wrote:
+static __always_inline struct kmem_cache *
+memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp)
I still don't understand why this code uses __always_inline so much.
I don't recall seeing the compiler
12 matches
Mail list logo