On 05/23/2014 09:23 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 05/23/2014 09:18 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 09:07:18PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>>> On 05/23/2014 09:03 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 05/23/2014 09:01 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 09:07:18PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 05/23/2014 09:03 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> > On 05/23/2014 09:01 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:48:07PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> >>> On 05/23/2014 08:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On
On 05/23/2014 09:18 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 09:07:18PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> On 05/23/2014 09:03 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>>> On 05/23/2014 09:01 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:48:07PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On
On 05/23/2014 09:03 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 05/23/2014 09:01 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:48:07PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>>> On 05/23/2014 08:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:15:35PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>>> +
On 05/23/2014 09:01 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:48:07PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> On 05/23/2014 08:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:15:35PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> + * During CPU offline, we don't want the
On 05/23/2014 08:51 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:42:20PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>>Re-enable interrupts Re-enable interrupts
>>
>> The pending IPI is noted
>>
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:48:07PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 05/23/2014 08:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:15:35PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> + * During CPU offline, we don't want the other CPUs to
> send
> +
On 05/23/2014 08:34 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:15:35PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> On 05/23/2014 06:52 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:42:20PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
During CPU offline, stop-machine is used to take
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:42:20PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>Re-enable interrupts Re-enable interrupts
>
> The pending IPI is noted
> immediately, but
On 05/23/2014 08:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:15:35PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
+ * During CPU offline, we don't want the other CPUs to send
+ * IPIs to the active_cpu (the outgoing CPU) *after* it has
+ * disabled
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:15:35PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> >> + * During CPU offline, we don't want the other CPUs to send
> >> + * IPIs to the active_cpu (the outgoing CPU) *after* it has
> >> + * disabled interrupts (because, then it will notice the IPIs
>
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:15:35PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 05/23/2014 06:52 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:42:20PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> >> During CPU offline, stop-machine is used to take control over all the
> >> online
> >> CPUs (via the
On 05/23/2014 06:52 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:42:20PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> During CPU offline, stop-machine is used to take control over all the online
>> CPUs (via the per-cpu stopper thread) and then run take_cpu_down() on the CPU
>> that is to be
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:42:20PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> During CPU offline, stop-machine is used to take control over all the online
> CPUs (via the per-cpu stopper thread) and then run take_cpu_down() on the CPU
> that is to be taken offline.
>
> But stop-machine itself has several
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:42:20PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
During CPU offline, stop-machine is used to take control over all the online
CPUs (via the per-cpu stopper thread) and then run take_cpu_down() on the CPU
that is to be taken offline.
But stop-machine itself has several
On 05/23/2014 06:52 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:42:20PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
During CPU offline, stop-machine is used to take control over all the online
CPUs (via the per-cpu stopper thread) and then run take_cpu_down() on the CPU
that is to be taken
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:15:35PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 05/23/2014 06:52 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:42:20PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
During CPU offline, stop-machine is used to take control over all the
online
CPUs (via the per-cpu
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:15:35PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
+ * During CPU offline, we don't want the other CPUs to send
+ * IPIs to the active_cpu (the outgoing CPU) *after* it has
+ * disabled interrupts (because, then it will notice the IPIs
+
On 05/23/2014 08:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:15:35PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
+ * During CPU offline, we don't want the other CPUs to send
+ * IPIs to the active_cpu (the outgoing CPU) *after* it has
+ * disabled interrupts
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:42:20PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
Re-enable interrupts Re-enable interrupts
The pending IPI is noted
immediately, but alas,
On 05/23/2014 08:34 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:15:35PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 05/23/2014 06:52 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:42:20PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
During CPU offline, stop-machine is used to take control
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:48:07PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 05/23/2014 08:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:15:35PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
+ * During CPU offline, we don't want the other CPUs to
send
+ * IPIs to the
On 05/23/2014 08:51 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:42:20PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
Re-enable interrupts Re-enable interrupts
The pending IPI is noted
On 05/23/2014 09:01 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:48:07PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 05/23/2014 08:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:15:35PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
+ * During CPU offline, we don't want the other CPUs
On 05/23/2014 09:03 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 05/23/2014 09:01 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:48:07PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 05/23/2014 08:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:15:35PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
+*
On 05/23/2014 09:18 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 09:07:18PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 05/23/2014 09:03 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 05/23/2014 09:01 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:48:07PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 05/23/2014 08:42
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 09:07:18PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 05/23/2014 09:03 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 05/23/2014 09:01 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:48:07PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 05/23/2014 08:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, May 23,
On 05/23/2014 09:23 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 05/23/2014 09:18 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 09:07:18PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 05/23/2014 09:03 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 05/23/2014 09:01 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:48:07PM
28 matches
Mail list logo