On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 08:11:53PM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> The equivalence table size can be computed in the late loader - there is
> no problem there.
>
> However, this computed size needs to be passed somehow to functions
> scanning the equivalence table.
Ok, then let's make a compr
On 18.06.2018 18:44, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:08:31PM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> That was the solution before this patch series version (6) - there was
>> a variable holding the CPU equivalence table size for the late loader,
>> but you didn't like it:> Instead
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:08:31PM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> That was the solution before this patch series version (6) - there was
> a variable holding the CPU equivalence table size for the late loader,
> but you didn't like it:> Instead of adding yet another global var which needs
> h
On 05.06.2018 10:55, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 12:07:22AM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> Currently, the code scanning a CPU equivalence table read from a microcode
>> container file assumes that it actually contains a terminating zero entry,
>> but if does not then the
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 12:07:22AM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> Currently, the code scanning a CPU equivalence table read from a microcode
> container file assumes that it actually contains a terminating zero entry,
> but if does not then the code will continue the scan past its valid data.
5 matches
Mail list logo
