Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 03:02:15PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > Hi Lorenzo, > > On 2017/2/4 2:36, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > Hanjun, Sinan, > > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 08:54:50PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > >> From: Hanjun Guo > >> > >> With platform msi support landed

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 03:02:15PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > Hi Lorenzo, > > On 2017/2/4 2:36, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > Hanjun, Sinan, > > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 08:54:50PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > >> From: Hanjun Guo > >> > >> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

Hi Lorenzo, On 2017/2/4 2:36, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > Hanjun, Sinan, > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 08:54:50PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> From: Hanjun Guo >> >> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction >> of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

Hi Lorenzo, On 2017/2/4 2:36, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > Hanjun, Sinan, > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 08:54:50PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> From: Hanjun Guo >> >> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction >> of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

On 2017/2/3 22:50, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 1/18/2017 7:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> From: Hanjun Guo >> >> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction >> of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform msi >> is ready, this patch

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

On 2017/2/3 22:50, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 1/18/2017 7:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> From: Hanjun Guo >> >> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction >> of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform msi >> is ready, this patch set add few patches to

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

Hanjun, Sinan, On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 08:54:50PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > From: Hanjun Guo > > With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction > of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform msi > is ready, this patch set add

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

Hanjun, Sinan, On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 08:54:50PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > From: Hanjun Guo > > With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction > of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform msi > is ready, this patch set add few patches to enable

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

On 2/3/2017 11:40 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > (2) Your HIDMA MSI does not depend on Agustin patch series to work I confirm that my driver doesn't depend on Agustin's patch. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

On 2/3/2017 11:40 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > (2) Your HIDMA MSI does not depend on Agustin patch series to work I confirm that my driver doesn't depend on Agustin's patch. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 10:57:44AM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 2/3/2017 10:49 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > >> Patches 13-15 are specific for MBIGEN. 00-12 are for the base > >> functionality. > > Is that to support SMMUv3's own MSI generation? It would be helpful if > > you explained why you want

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 10:57:44AM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 2/3/2017 10:49 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > >> Patches 13-15 are specific for MBIGEN. 00-12 are for the base > >> functionality. > > Is that to support SMMUv3's own MSI generation? It would be helpful if > > you explained why you want

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

On 2/3/2017 10:49 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> Patches 13-15 are specific for MBIGEN. 00-12 are for the base functionality. > Is that to support SMMUv3's own MSI generation? It would be helpful if > you explained why you want this code to be merged beforehand, > potentially without any in-tree user.

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

On 2/3/2017 10:49 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> Patches 13-15 are specific for MBIGEN. 00-12 are for the base functionality. > Is that to support SMMUv3's own MSI generation? It would be helpful if > you explained why you want this code to be merged beforehand, > potentially without any in-tree user.

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

On 03/02/17 15:35, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 2/3/2017 10:11 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> On 03/02/17 14:50, Sinan Kaya wrote: >>> On 1/18/2017 7:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: From: Hanjun Guo With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction of

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

On 03/02/17 15:35, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 2/3/2017 10:11 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> On 03/02/17 14:50, Sinan Kaya wrote: >>> On 1/18/2017 7:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: From: Hanjun Guo With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

On 2/3/2017 10:11 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 03/02/17 14:50, Sinan Kaya wrote: >> On 1/18/2017 7:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: >>> From: Hanjun Guo >>> >>> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction >>> of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

On 2/3/2017 10:11 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 03/02/17 14:50, Sinan Kaya wrote: >> On 1/18/2017 7:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: >>> From: Hanjun Guo >>> >>> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction >>> of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

On 03/02/17 14:50, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 1/18/2017 7:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> From: Hanjun Guo >> >> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction >> of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform msi >> is ready, this patch

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

On 03/02/17 14:50, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 1/18/2017 7:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> From: Hanjun Guo >> >> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction >> of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform msi >> is ready, this patch set add few patches to

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

On 1/18/2017 7:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: > From: Hanjun Guo > > With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction > of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform msi > is ready, this patch set add few patches to enable the ACPI

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

On 1/18/2017 7:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: > From: Hanjun Guo > > With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction > of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform msi > is ready, this patch set add few patches to enable the ACPI platform > msi support. >