On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 11:25 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 07:28:15PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 03:31 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 01:28:57PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > > Here's the much
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 11:25 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 07:28:15PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 03:31 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 01:28:57PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
Here's the much anticipated re-write
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 05:42:38PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/21/2012 10:28 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > Here's the much anticipated re-write of support for level irqfds. As
> > Michael suggested, I've rolled the eoi/ack notification fd into
> > KVM_IRQFD as a new mode. For lack of a
On 08/21/2012 10:28 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Here's the much anticipated re-write of support for level irqfds. As
> Michael suggested, I've rolled the eoi/ack notification fd into
> KVM_IRQFD as a new mode. For lack of a better name, as there seems to
> be objections to associating this
On 08/21/2012 10:28 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
Here's the much anticipated re-write of support for level irqfds. As
Michael suggested, I've rolled the eoi/ack notification fd into
KVM_IRQFD as a new mode. For lack of a better name, as there seems to
be objections to associating this
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 05:42:38PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/21/2012 10:28 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
Here's the much anticipated re-write of support for level irqfds. As
Michael suggested, I've rolled the eoi/ack notification fd into
KVM_IRQFD as a new mode. For lack of a better
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 01:28:57PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Here's the much anticipated re-write of support for level irqfds. As
> Michael suggested, I've rolled the eoi/ack notification fd into
> KVM_IRQFD as a new mode. For lack of a better name, as there seems to
> be objections to
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 07:28:15PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 03:31 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 01:28:57PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > Here's the much anticipated re-write of support for level irqfds. As
> > > Michael suggested,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 07:28:15PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 03:31 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 01:28:57PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
Here's the much anticipated re-write of support for level irqfds. As
Michael suggested, I've
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 01:28:57PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
Here's the much anticipated re-write of support for level irqfds. As
Michael suggested, I've rolled the eoi/ack notification fd into
KVM_IRQFD as a new mode. For lack of a better name, as there seems to
be objections to
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 03:31 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 01:28:57PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > Here's the much anticipated re-write of support for level irqfds. As
> > Michael suggested, I've rolled the eoi/ack notification fd into
> > KVM_IRQFD as a new mode.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 01:28:57PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Here's the much anticipated re-write of support for level irqfds. As
> Michael suggested, I've rolled the eoi/ack notification fd into
> KVM_IRQFD as a new mode. For lack of a better name, as there seems to
> be objections to
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 01:28:57PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
Here's the much anticipated re-write of support for level irqfds. As
Michael suggested, I've rolled the eoi/ack notification fd into
KVM_IRQFD as a new mode. For lack of a better name, as there seems to
be objections to
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 03:31 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 01:28:57PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
Here's the much anticipated re-write of support for level irqfds. As
Michael suggested, I've rolled the eoi/ack notification fd into
KVM_IRQFD as a new mode. For
14 matches
Mail list logo
