Re: [PATCH v9 8/8] perf: ARM DynamIQ Shared Unit PMU support

2017-11-03 Thread Suzuki K Poulose
On 03/11/17 12:20, Mark Rutland wrote: Hi Suzuki, This looks good, but there are a couple of edge cases I think that we need to handle, as noted below. On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 05:23:18PM +, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: Changes since V8: - Fill in the "module" field for the PMU to prevent

Re: [PATCH v9 8/8] perf: ARM DynamIQ Shared Unit PMU support

2017-11-03 Thread Suzuki K Poulose
On 03/11/17 12:20, Mark Rutland wrote: Hi Suzuki, This looks good, but there are a couple of edge cases I think that we need to handle, as noted below. On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 05:23:18PM +, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: Changes since V8: - Fill in the "module" field for the PMU to prevent

Re: [PATCH v9 8/8] perf: ARM DynamIQ Shared Unit PMU support

2017-11-03 Thread Mark Rutland
Hi Suzuki, This looks good, but there are a couple of edge cases I think that we need to handle, as noted below. On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 05:23:18PM +, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > Changes since V8: > - Fill in the "module" field for the PMU to prevent the module unload >when the PMU is

Re: [PATCH v9 8/8] perf: ARM DynamIQ Shared Unit PMU support

2017-11-03 Thread Mark Rutland
Hi Suzuki, This looks good, but there are a couple of edge cases I think that we need to handle, as noted below. On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 05:23:18PM +, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > Changes since V8: > - Fill in the "module" field for the PMU to prevent the module unload >when the PMU is