On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 04:36:38AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 10:24:50AM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> ...
> > [ 317.251001] PC is at bit_waitqueue+0x38/0x6c
> ...
> > [ 317.420658] [] (bit_waitqueue) from []
> > (__cancel_work_timer+0x28/0x1b0)
> > [ 317.430598] []
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 10:24:50AM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
...
> [ 317.251001] PC is at bit_waitqueue+0x38/0x6c
...
> [ 317.420658] [] (bit_waitqueue) from []
> (__cancel_work_timer+0x28/0x1b0)
> [ 317.430598] [] (__cancel_work_timer) from []
> (cancel_work_sync+0x1c/0x20)
> [ 317.440672]
On 3 March 2015 at 14:57, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On 3 March 2015 at 14:45, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Found the culprit. Plain wake_up() shouldn't be used on
>> bit_waitqueues. The following patch should fix the issue. I replaced
>> the patch in the wq branches.
>
> Yup, this looks good
On 3 March 2015 at 14:57, Tomeu Vizoso tomeu.viz...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 March 2015 at 14:45, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello,
Found the culprit. Plain wake_up() shouldn't be used on
bit_waitqueues. The following patch should fix the issue. I replaced
the patch in the wq branches.
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 10:24:50AM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
...
[ 317.251001] PC is at bit_waitqueue+0x38/0x6c
...
[ 317.420658] [c028fe18] (bit_waitqueue) from [c0270d34]
(__cancel_work_timer+0x28/0x1b0)
[ 317.430598] [c0270d34] (__cancel_work_timer) from [c0270ed8]
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 04:36:38AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 10:24:50AM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
...
[ 317.251001] PC is at bit_waitqueue+0x38/0x6c
...
[ 317.420658] [c028fe18] (bit_waitqueue) from [c0270d34]
(__cancel_work_timer+0x28/0x1b0)
[ 317.430598]
On 3 March 2015 at 14:45, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Found the culprit. Plain wake_up() shouldn't be used on
> bit_waitqueues. The following patch should fix the issue. I replaced
> the patch in the wq branches.
Yup, this looks good from here.
Thanks,
Tomeu
> Thanks a lot.
>
> - 8<
On 3 March 2015 at 14:45, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello,
Found the culprit. Plain wake_up() shouldn't be used on
bit_waitqueues. The following patch should fix the issue. I replaced
the patch in the wq branches.
Yup, this looks good from here.
Thanks,
Tomeu
Thanks a lot.
8 matches
Mail list logo